Articles - A declaration of intent by the DWP


On 26 June 2018, the DWP published the first of its promised consultations following on from the White Paper. This new consultation, which closes today the 21st August 2018, covers proposals for a range of new powers for the Pensions Regulator (TPR). As well as modifying the notifiable events framework, making some potentially sweeping changes to the anti-avoidance powers and introducing the prospect of more penal fines and sanctions, the DWP have proposed an entirely new “Declaration of Intent” framework.

 By Chris Parlour, Senior Consultant, XPS Pensions Group
  
 Although the impact of the proposed changes is likely to be limited for the vast majority of employers, the consultation aims at ensuring TPR is better equipped to step in where it is believed an employer is putting their pension scheme at risk.
  
 Under the proposed new framework, sponsoring employers will be required to make a statement of intention, setting out the nature of the planned transaction, its implications for the pension scheme and how any risks will be mitigated. The declaration of intent framework will cover the following types of corporate activity:
 • the sale of controlling interests in a sponsoring employer;
 • the sale of the business or assets of a sponsoring employer; or
 • the granting of creditor priority above the pension scheme.
  
 A declaration of intent will take the form of a written communication addressed to the trustees and copied to TPR.
  
 Risk based criteria are going to be set by TPR in due course to determine when an employer will have to produce a declaration of intent. Not every transaction covered under the framework will automatically be caught – some may be exempt, for example, if the pension scheme is fully funded.
  
 The proposed changes to the notifiable events framework will result in much earlier consideration of the pension scheme and engagement with TPR if the event is one of the three types listed above for which a declaration of intent will be required. At present, employers are only required to notify after an event has taken place, which has minimal impact on the transaction. Under the new framework, employers will be required notify as soon as an agreement in principle has been reached. A declaration of intent would then be required after due diligence and transaction financing have been finalised, but before a sale and purchase agreement is signed.
  
 The proposals on the declaration of intent could therefore signal a significant change in how pensions will need to be taken into account in transactions. A key consideration previously had been when in a sale process to engage with trustees – before, during or after the deal has been signed. Subject to any thresholds or risk based criteria that are set, the option to engage post transaction may no longer be viable.
  
 Given the proposed widening of TPR’s powers to impose larger civil and even criminal sanctions, it will also mean companies and investors are likely to want some formal comfort (i.e. clearance) from TPR before involving themselves in a transaction that has implications for a pension scheme. Absent of a significant change in resourcing and response times from TPR this may stop some transactions being possible – for example, any buyer of a listed entity has to make a binding offer within 28 days of announcing a firm intention to bid under the City Code. TPR may therefore need to be substantially more responsive when certain types of transactions are referred to it, otherwise some deals could have to be abandoned
  
 There is no detail on what the new clearance regime might look like in the consultation document. Given the potential criminal consequences alongside easier to apply anti-avoidance powers some beneficial transactions may not be able to proceed without the TPR’s approval process being completely revamped. The deal market really will need clearance to be possible in a much shorter timeframe than historically. Other changes such as including a new “soft” clearance process for cases where there is no detriment to the pension scheme could also be really helpful.
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

The real risks of freedoms
When pension freedoms first came into play there was no doubt that while they offered welcome flexibility, they also resulted in more risks that cou
Skilled actuaries required
Since the upheaval of pension freedoms in 2015 when drawdown rules were relaxed and annuity sales declined, the role of actuaries in the DC space has
A step change is expected for DB pension scheme funding
Mike Smedley, Pensions Partner at KPMG in the UK discusses some of the changes expected for DB pension scheme funding in 2019

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.