Articles - EDHEC-Risk Institute welcomes vote delay


 EDHEC-Risk Institute welcomes delay of European Parliament vote on the regulation of financial benchmarks and calls for high and uniform standards of transparency to allow investors to make informed decisions and promote integrity, competition and innovation in the indexing industry.

 Needing more time to reach consensus, the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee has delayed its vote on the proposed regulation of financial benchmarks amid divergences over the scope of the regulation and the supervisory role of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).

 To reduce the risk of benchmark manipulation, the European Commission proposed to regulate a very wide spectrum of indices, while subjecting inter-bank interest rate benchmarks, commodity benchmarks and critical benchmarks to additional requirements. Given the onerous compliance requirements that the Commission proposed to impose on all benchmark providers irrespective of the quality and transparency of their indices, EDHEC-Risk Institute welcomes the Committee’s proposals to focus the regulation on critical, vulnerable or systemically relevant benchmarks while further expanding the scope of the indices covered by the regulation, and to mandate ESMA to develop regulatory technical standards for a risk-based proportionate implementation. Such an approach avoids imposing costs which, owing to the oligopolistic nature of the indexing industry would likely be passed on to end-investors, and which, falling disproportionately on smaller and less-established providers, would support further industry concentration with adverse investor welfare consequences in the form of increased pricing power by leading providers and reduced innovation.

 At the same time, EDHEC-Risk Institute calls upon the Committee and the European Parliament to ensure that all benchmarks used in the European Union be required–on a complimentary basis and on fair and non-discriminatory terms–to provide both historical data (e.g. index levels, components and weightings) and detailed methodology to permit independent historical index replication on a non-commercial basis. Such transparency would allow all interested parties to verify the integrity of track records and measure the extent of discretion exercised in the application of methodologies. More importantly, it would enable investors to assess benchmark suitability by analysing the benefits, risks and costs of indices in the context of their particular objectives and constraints as well as integrate indices into a modern risk and investment management framework.

 By adopting this standard of transparency, which exactly corresponds to that introduced by ESMA for the eligibility of financial indices within UCITS , the European legislator would not only allow the appropriate use of robust and reliable benchmarks, which is the other objective of the proposed regulation, but also foster information-based competition and further innovation in the indexing industry.
    

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

It aint what you do its the way that you do it
....that’s what gets results…. I may be showing my age with this Bananarama song but it’s really appropriate now we’ve started to see the first DC C
One more year so can we stop thinking about IFRS17 for now
On 14 November 2018, the IASB announced a deferment of the IFRS17 implementation date by a year, with some still calling for a two year delay.You coul
Allowing for climate related risks
Allowing for climate related risks when setting long term financial assumptions

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.