Articles - European Commission adoption of CRD IV


 The European Commission has at last adopted its long-awaited proposal to strengthen the European banking sector through stricter capital requirements and better liquidity management, obliging the EU’s banking institutions to hold more and better quality capital to prevent the markets drying up in times of crisis.
  
 The product of the Commission’s efforts can be seen today in the form of a Regulation and a Directive, which should be considered together as one package. As Mario Nava, the Commission official leading the drafting process, has pointed out, the best way to achieve a Single Rulebook in the EU is through a Regulation.
  
 Mirroring Basel III, the Regulation requires banks to hold 4.5% of Minimum Tier 1 Capital in 2013, which will be gradually increased until it reaches 6% in 2019. In addition, banks will need to hold onto an additional 2.5% in the Capital Conservation Buffer, as well as to a Countercyclical Capital Buffer between 0% and 2.5%, which is to be determined at national level.
 
 Cicero Brussels Senior Associate Tim Gieles commented:
 “European Commissioner Michel Barnier has been accused of being both too soft and too hard in implementing Basel III. European banks say the requirements are too tough and will prevent banks from lending. The European Banking Federation (EBF) said it welcomes the Single Rulebook for banks, but has concerns about the impact of the liquidity provisions on bank lending.
  
 However, although the Regulation notes that nothing prevents institutions from holding more capital, national Member States may not impose stricter rules. Avoiding regulatory arbitrage is Barnier’s concern.  Some Member States including the UK, Sweden and Spain have on the other hand stated that maximum harmonisation is not the aim of the CRD, and instead they call for more flexibility in the implementation of CRD IV.
  
 A political observation can also be made about CRD IV: the lack of reliance on external credit assessments. Indeed, the vast majority of the Regulation prescribes how banking institutions should develop their own models to calculate their exposures in their portfolios, and this forms the basis for determining their minimum capital requirements. The role and activities of Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs), as we know, will be further addressed by legislation in autumn of this year, but today’s proposals already encourage banks to carry out their own analysis of risk, rather than relying automatically on external ratings.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Two of the proposed amendments to IFRS 17
In this video Deloitte outlines two of the proposed amendments to IFRS 17, the separate presentation of groups of assets and groups of liabilities on
Bundled vs Unbundled doing the sums
There’s a lot of technical jargon when it comes to pensions. Which is why the use of ‘bundled’ and ‘unbundled’ always amuses me slightly. Amongst hars
Data Scientists taming Artificial Intelligence
Outside of tech and data driven companies the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI) divides people. On the one hand you have companies like AvatarMi

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.