Pensions - Articles - Solvency II could require pension scheme increase of £600bn


 According to analysis published today by J.P. Morgan Asset Management, Solvency II for Pensions, could require UK pension schemes to increase funding by £600 billion or more.

 ‘Solvency II for Pensions', looks at the implications of the "Call for Advice on the Review of the Directive 2003/41/EC: second consultation", which closed on 2nd January 2012.

 Paul Sweeting, European Head, Strategy Group at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, and one of the authors of the report, comments: "The implications of ‘Solvency II for Pensions' for UK pension schemes are tremendous. They will place additional burden on DB pension schemes and large contributions on behalf of sponsors would be necessary to bring UK pension schemes in line with the requirements."

 The report finds that:

 The three pillar approach to regulation set out in Solvency II and Basel II works well for insurers and banks, but the third pillar - market discipline - has no relevance to pension schemes
 If Solvency 2 for pensions is introduced, we could be looking at a requirement to increase pension scheme funding by £600bn or more, if investments are required to meet not just Solvency 2 liabilities, but also the capital buffer (the Solvency Capital Requirement) and
 The increased governance and reporting requirements will place an additional financial burden on DB pension scheme

 Professor Sweeting added: "We question whether a regulatory framework that is designed for large-scale and active insurers is appropriate for application to pension schemes. There are, though, a number of ways in which the adverse effect of the proposals on the schemes can be mitigated. For example, allowing for an illiquidity premium in the valuation of liabilities could significantly reduce the impact of new funding rules. In fact, for every 100 basis points (1%) added to the liability discount rate, the aggregate deficit would fall by around £200 billion. We hope that steps will be taken to limit the potential adverse impact of new regulation on pension schemes and their sponsoring employers. But whatever happens, the full impact of the changes must be carefully considered before any new rules are put in place."

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Scottish Widows appoints Stuart Paton Evans to new role
Scottish Widows has underlined its long term commitment to the annuities and retirement market with the appointment of Stuart Paton Evans to a newl
New retirees see income drop by two thirds
Although last month’s Budget announcement gives new retirees more choice about how they take their pension, they can still expect to see thei
Extra staff required for auto-enrolment setup
Six out of ten small businesses need extra staff to cope with auto-enrolment pensions Six out of ten of the UK’s smallest businesses hav

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.