Articles - Throwing in the towel on VAT on pension costs


HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) appears to have given up the fight in relation to VAT on defined benefit (DB) pension costs and as predicted, we may now never see a certain Europe-wide VAT ruling applied to pension schemes in the UK. Tyron Potts from Barnett Waddingham considers why - and what trustees and corporate sponsors should do next.

 For the past four and half years, pension schemes have been waiting for firm guidance from HMRC as to how a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in the case of the Dutch Company Fiscal Eenheid PPG Holdings BV (PPG) should be applied to the costs they incur.
  
 In particular, many sponsors who have been meeting pension administration expenses directly have been able to reclaim the VAT on those costs as a legitimate business expense. In July 2013, the CJEU ruled that in order to continue this practice, they must establish a ‘’direct and immediate’’ link between the employer and the expense on which VAT is charged. HMRC’s interpretation was that the employer should be a party to the contract, pay for the services directly and be the recipient of those services.
  
 In a series of briefing notes and updates between 2014 and 2017, HMRC has:
     
  1.   Set out how VAT on ‘administration services’ (such as actuarial and administration fees) was deductible (recoverable) by the sponsoring employer however, VAT on ‘investment management services’ could not be deducted.
  2.  
  3.   Implemented a transitional rule under which employers could assume a 30:70 split between administration and investment management services. An explicit breakdown of combined invoices was not available or it was unclear to which classification the fees related.
  4.  
  5.   Extended this transitional rule on three separate occasions as they grappled with the complexities.
  6.  
  7.   Considered a number of potential workarounds which included:
  8.  
  9.   tripartite contracts between trustees, sponsoring company and scheme advisers
  10.  
  11.   trustee companies joining the sponsoring company’s VAT grouping; or
  12.  
  13.   setting up an onward supply (or ‘back-to-back’) arrangement where a VAT-registered trustee is effectively sub-contracted by the sponsor to run the pension scheme

 HMRC's latest briefing

 Actually, HMRC hasn’t (at the time of writing this blog) issued any further briefings about VAT on DB pension costs. With little fanfare, it has instead updated an online technical manual to reflect its current stance – hoping that schemes and advisers would spot it and take appropriate action.
  
 Possibly with half an eye on Brexit (when the UK may no longer be bound by certain CJEU rulings), HMRC has now:
     
  1.   Confirmed that the VAT-reclaim approach set out in previous briefings (notably VAT notice 700/17) will remain available to use after 31 December 2017.
  2.  
  3.   Conceded that where one of the workarounds described above (tripartite contracts etc) has already been implemented, or is implemented in future, employers may instead continue to use this route to reclaim VAT.
  4.  
  5.   Issued a more detailed list of what constitutes ‘administration services’ and ‘investment management services’ to allow invoices to be split out accurately.
  6.  
  7.   Reminded us that many DC schemes will continue to benefit from a VAT exemption by virtue of being classified as a ‘Special Investment Fund’ (SIF).
  8.  
  9.   Closed a loop-hole (originally with effect from 1 January 2018, but now from 1 April 2019) which allowed insurance companies to treat their pension fund management services as VAT exempt (unless provided to a SIF).

 Next Steps

 Whilst it may be tempting to do nothing, maintaining the status quo may not always result in the optimal VAT recovery. Employers and trustees should therefore engage with advisers to establish how their services are classified and whether additional VAT might be reclaimed by the pension scheme’s sponsor.
  
 Where the scheme is run by an insurance company, trustees could take this opportunity to review whether costs are likely to rise from 2019 as VAT will now be incurred on management costs.
  
 If you have restructured contractual agreements between trustees, sponsors and advisers in order to position for future VAT recovery, you should be aware of possible complications that may arise in relation to additional corporate tax liabilities for example.
  
 In such cases, specialist tax advice may be appropriate.
  
 It seems that, after several years we have come full circle in relation to VAT and many employers will find that the wait-and-see approach has paid off. 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Skilled actuaries required
Since the upheaval of pension freedoms in 2015 when drawdown rules were relaxed and annuity sales declined, the role of actuaries in the DC space ha
A step change is expected for DB pension scheme funding
Mike Smedley, Pensions Partner at KPMG in the UK discusses some of the changes expected for DB pension scheme funding in 2019
What does the ideal actuarial consultant look like
We recently published our Navigating Change report, which looks at the changing role of the actuarial consultant. One issue that struck me was the wid

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.