General Insurance Article - Will EC Commission continue to ignore Solvency II evidence


Insurance Europe has raised serious concerns in its response to a consultation by the European Commission on its draft proposals for the 2018 review of the Solvency II Delegated Regulation.

 While the industry welcomes the Commission’s aim of simplifying Solvency II and increasing proportionality in its application, the proposals lack ambition in several important areas. Unless the final text is improved, the Commission will miss a key opportunity to remove barriers to long-term investment and to unlock insurers’ capacity to support the growth that Europe’s economy so desperately needs.

 The Commission’s proposals for the recalibration of long-term equity and the review of the risk margin – both of which have a significant impact on insurers’ capacity for long-term investments and to support the objectives of the Commission’s Capital Markets Union project – must be more ambitious. While acknowledging the Commission’s recognition that action is needed on long-term equity investments, Insurance Europe warned that the Commission’s technical proposal will not work in practice. It is therefore calling for swift action by the Commission to amend its proposal so that it has the intended impact.

 Regarding the risk margin, it should first be noted that this is a conceptual element of Solvency II that, according to the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, accounts for €200 billion of insurers’ capital and is over and above the amount needed to pay customer claims. There is significant evidence that the 6% cost of capital, a key element of its calibration, is too high. This impacts, in particular, long-term products and investment. If the Commission continues to ignore this evidence and preserve the status quo, it will miss a key opportunity to reduce the current barriers to long-term investment by insurers. While a more complete review of its purpose and design can take place in the 2020 review, a first step is needed and justified now.

 Insurance Europe also said the review provides the opportunity to take a first step in improving the design of the volatility adjustment, by refining the trigger mechanism for the application of the country adjustment.

 It also raised other concerns, including the need to avoid unnecessary limits on the calculation of loss absorbing capacity of deferred tax (LAC DT), which can be found in its response to the consultation.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Research reveals major flaws in commercial cyber insurance
Mactavish, the UK’s leading expert on insurance governance, says there has been a surge in businesses buying specialist cyber insurance, but it warns
Is Blue Monday the most depressing day of the year
Paul Avis, Marketing Director at Canada Life Group Insurance, comments on Blue Monda
58 percent of motorists fail to declare non claim accidents
Motor insurance providers urgently need to create greater clarity and trust around the use of accident and claims data in pricing motor insurance poli

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.