Investment - Articles - Call for the suspension of PRIIPs regime


PIMFA, the trade association for wealth managers and financial advisers, believes that information being provided to investors in accordance with the PRIIPs KID regime is doing them more harm than good and that the ESAs’ hastily-drafted proposals for amending KID performance scenarios are unlikely to improve the situation.

 Although concerns about the reliability of KID performance scenarios have been the most headline-grabbing element of the PRIIPs regime so far, it has many other significant flaws which the ESAs’ recent consultation fails to mention at all.

 PIMFA’s view is that retail investors should not be provided – as a matter of regulatory requirement - with product information that is, at best, unhelpful and, at worst, misleading. Consequently, we are calling for the application of the PRIIPs regime to be suspended until such time as a full and thorough review is completed and a more informative, fit-for-purpose regime that both consumers and industry can have confidence in can take its place.

 PIMFA considers that Monday’s vote by the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee to extend UCITS’ exemption from the PRIIPs regime by 2 years to 31 December 2021 and to set a new deadline of 31 December 2019 for the European

 Commission to complete its review of the PRIIPs Regulation paves the way for such an approach. It also signals a wider recognition that piecemeal amendments of the type proposed by the ESAs are not the way forward.

 Liz Field, PIMFA’s CEO, said “We believe that the ESAs’ consultation exercise is misconceived, a “sticking plaster” that can neither hide nor address the fundamental flaws of the regime as a whole. Virtually every aspect of the PRIIPs regime – scope, risk indicators, cost disclosures, access to third country products – is problematic and the ESAs’ targeted review looking only at performance scenarios fails to acknowledge or address this."

 "An immediate suspension of the PRIIPs regime would have multiple benefits – it would prevent investors from being misinformed by regulatory disclosures, it would save industry from spending time and money on ill-considered quick-fixes that do not work, it would provide time for a thorough-going review of all aspects of the regime and it would enable a fresh start at some future point that regulators, industry and investors alike could support.”

 PIMFA’s response to the ESAs’ “Joint Consultation Paper concerning amendments to the PRIIPs KID” can be found here.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Footsie falters amid tech jitters and French unrest
Footsie loses momentum as Wall Street’s tech sell-off, elevated energy prices and unrest in France keep investors on edge. Oil remains a pressure poin
Tech nerves are calmed but rate worries clouds outlook
A mini rotation back into tech has taken some of the shine off the Footsie after a strong week for the blue-chip index. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang has help
Nearly half of working women feel financially vulnerable
New research reveals 49% of working women are now classed as financially vulnerable. 14% higher than the number of men experiencing financial vulnerab

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.