Pensions - Articles - DB pensions white paper on setting objectives for charities


The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) issued a White Paper earlier this year, explaining their proposals for increasing protections for defined benefit (DB) pension scheme members and making improvements to the system.

 By Jonathan Marrow, FIA, Associate at Barnett Waddingham

 One area they have focussed on is a requirement for pension trustees to set a long-term funding objective for their scheme, and then to report against that objective. For pension schemes that are open to new members and future accrual, the objective may be to continue relying on employer support. However, for the majority of DB schemes which are closed either to new members or to all future accrual, the objective is more likely to be purchasing full benefits with an insurance company by a set time, or targeting an approach where reliance on the employer is minimised.

 What might be a suitable objective for a charity’s pension scheme?
 One of the key drivers for charities will be to reduce volatility and the likelihood of large increases in deficit contribution requirements.

 This is important to avoid larger proportions of the charity’s budget being spent on pension scheme deficits rather than charitable activities.

 However, many charities have been operating for a significant period of time, and will envisage continuing their activities over a very long horizon. If so, a suitable objective may be to target a position where the pension scheme is sufficiently funded to support itself with a lower risk-investment strategy, reducing the likelihood of relying on contributions from the employer. This is commonly referred to as a “self-sufficiency” objective.

 Reducing volatility on the journey to self-sufficiency
 A typical approach for many pension schemes is “high risk now, low risk later”. For example, it is often assumed that higher risk assets such as equities are held for non-retired members, gradually switching to safer assets such as government bonds as members retire.

 Given the desire to reduce volatility, for charities in a stable financial position a more sensible approach may be to take a consistent level of risk over a longer period of time. This could mean significantly less risk now, compensated for by slightly more risk over the long term.

 This alternative would reduce the chance of significant additional contributions being needed in the short term, as the investment risk is spread over a longer period rather than being heavily concentrated during the next few years. 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR to sharpen decision making scrutiny after Kodak decision
The Pensions Regulator is introducing greater levels of scrutiny after its decision to allow Kodak to jettison it pension liabilities faced criticism.
CDC schemes could provide better outcomes for members
In responding to the DWP’s consultation on delivering collective defined contribution pension schemes which closed yesterday, XPS Pensions Group belie
Paying pension tax charges is not always a bad thing
The common perception is that people should do all they can to avoid paying these charges. This can lead to some people choosing to leave their pensio

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.