Life - Articles - GRiD says life to be made easier on employers offering GLA


Group Life Assurance (GLA) is one of the most popular group risk benefits offered to staff. At the end of 2017, over 9 million employees were covered across over 50,000* schemes providing a lump-sum payment on death. It has proved to be a financial lifeline for many, providing financial support at a time when a household needs it most. In 2017, over £1 billion was paid in claims

 However, knowing the best way to offer it to staff isn’t as clear-cut as it could be, says GRiD, the industry body for group risk protection benefits (employer-sponsored life assurance, income protection and critical illness).

 Provided the payments to beneficiaries are paid through a discretionary trust, they do not form part of the deceased’s estate so can be paid quickly (without the need for probate) and free from inheritance tax (IHT). For many years, the way to do this was to use a discretionary trust written under pensions legislation.

 Ironically, the introduction of the pension tax simplification regime in 2006 introduced some complexities for group life assurance. Excepted Group Life Policies (EGLPs) provide a simple alternative way of arranging life cover independent of a pension. For some people, particularly those who had protection for their pension tax position, life assurance could be provided more efficiently in this way. This means that benefits are disregarded when assessing pension tax charges. As the value of the Lifetime Allowance (LTA) has eroded and the simplicity of a non-pension arrangement has appealed to more employers, an increasing number of employees have been enrolled into EGLPs.

 However, EGLPs can have drawbacks: the discretionary trusts holding them are subject to possible entry, exit and periodic charges and can be complex to administer. As a consequence, employers have to pay for expertise in setting them up and monitoring them.

 It can also be extremely difficult for executors to accurately complete IHT forms if an EGLP benefit has been paid as it falls between the available reporting forms and the executor is unlikely to know how the policy was arranged in any case.

 Number affected
 The number of employees covered in EGLPs - so potentially affected - is 782,674, across 7,130 schemes*.

 Cost to employers
 The cost of administering the reporting and collection of taxes far exceeds the amount collected. Government figures show that the amount collected each year is no more than £1m. Yet, annually, the cost of administration is estimated to be £1.75m, to which can be added the cost of legal and technical advice. This figure is estimated to be close to £24m, paid over a number of years.

 Benefits for SMEs
 GRiD believes reducing compliance, legal and administrative costs in this area will both save employers money as well as encourage more SMEs and other businesses to provide cover for their employees. SMEs may well be put off of doing so because of the perceived cost, yet this sector often has the most need to provide GLA. Many SMEs are family-run businesses, and when employees die unexpectedly they often fund expenses from their own pocket. Providing death-in-service benefits helps protect them as well as their staff.

 What is GRiD doing about it?
 The Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) has called for evidence and experiences about perceptions of Inheritance Tax. GRiD has responded, laying out the benefits of GLA, and in particular EGLPs, for employers, employees and society as a whole.

 By providing quick financial support to dependants, the death benefit supports the aim of building resilient households and may lessen any potential call on state support. As these products are provided in an employment context, cover is frequently provided for many employees without medical evidence so that it is inclusive for those with some health problems who may not be accepted for a personal policy or only with an extra charge. For many people, particularly low- to middle-earners, this can be the only protection cover they have and ensures that they or their families do not fall back on the State.

 GRiD has called for:
 An exemption from potential entry, exit and periodic charges to IHT when the sole asset of a discretionary trust is an EGLP
 Removing the requirement that all members of an EGLP have the same benefit calculation
 Aligning the potential beneficiary classes for EGLPs and benefit-in-kind rules

 Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for GRiD said: ‘Group Life Assurance is a very popular benefit. It’s often one of the first protection benefits that employers offer their staff: it’s easy to understand, and provides a tangible financial benefit. The last thing we want is to put off employers from offering it, or add to their costs for doing so. We want to make it easier for employers to look after their staff, this has a direct benefit to Government so we hope they take our recommendations on board.’
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Time to revisit excepted life assurance schemes
The Finance (no.3) Bill currently making its way through Parliament contains a brief but significant change to the tax treatment of premiums paid in r
Life and Pensions Outlook for 2019 from EY
James Tufts, UK Head of Life & Pensions at EY, comments: “The industry is set for a challenging year and will have to navigate its way through mergers
Early diagnosis helps drive gains in future life expectancy
Life expectancy has steadily improved internationally for well over a century. In recent years, however, there are signs that the rate of mortality im

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.