Pensions - Articles - Judgement on PPF cap could have far reaching implications


The High Court has ruled that a cap on Pension Protection Fund (PPF) compensation for those with larger pensions, and which only applies to those under pension age, is illegal on age discrimination grounds.

 But as well as benefiting those directly affected, the judgment could have much wider implications according to LCP partner Steve Webb.

 Under current rules, the basic level of PPF compensation when a company becomes insolvent and its members are transferred to the PPF is 100% of scheme benefits if the member is over scheme pension age when the insolvency happens, and 90% if the member is under pension age.

 Separate to this, there is a maximum amount that can be paid in compensation (the PPF cap). But this cap *only* applies to those who are under pension age. The High Court has today ruled that this cap is unlawful. As a result, hundreds of capped PPF members may see their benefits increased, and in some cases will receive backdated payments.

 However, the court did not rule on whether paying 90% compensation to those under pension age and 100% to those over pension age is itself discriminatory. Changing this rule could affect hundreds of thousands of current and future generations of people of working age whose schemes end up in the PPF.

 The ruling could also affect the PPF levy payable by firms who have relatively large numbers of higher earners (because their deficit measured on a PPF basis would go up).

 Commenting, Steve Webb said: “This ruling is great news for thousands of workers whose pensions were capped simply because their company went bust before they reached pension age. But it could have a much wider knock-on effect. If it is discrimination to cap compensation on larger pensions only for those under pension age, there could be further legal challenge to the whole principle of only paying 90% compensation across the board for those under pension age. This could have much more far-reaching implications for the overall size of the PPF levy and for the levy payable by individual schemes and employers”.
  

 Judgement

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comment on BBCs verdict to end free TV licences for over 75s
Please see the below comment from Steven Cameron, Pensions Director at Aegon, on the BBC’s decision to go ahead with a plan to end free TV licences fo
PPF supports struggling levy payers with payment extension
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has announced that it will give levy payers struggling as a result of the coronavirus pandemic up to 90 days interes
Prediction of increased vulnerability on pension transfers
XPS Pensions Group’s latest survey ‘Member Outcomes Under Freedom and Choice’ shows a modest improvement in outcomes for pension scheme members choosi

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.