Investment - Articles - MiFID II more challenging than Brexit


New research shows that advisers consider MiFID II more challenging than Brexit and macroeconomic/geopolitical risks.

 A CoreData Research study surveying nearly 1,000 UK financial advisers found while volatile markets (28%) tops the list of challenges for advice businesses this year, MiFID II (19%) is deemed the second-biggest challenge. This is followed by Brexit (15%), macroeconomic and geopolitical risks (13%), GDPR (13%) and cybersecurity (9%).

 “The fact that advisers consider MiFID II more of a challenge than Brexit and macroeconomic risks speaks volumes about the scale of concern over the regulation,” says Craig Phillips, head of International, CoreData Research.

 The study also reveals a majority of advisers think MiFID II has been an unnecessary burden (57%), with a similar proportion seeing the regulation as a waste of time and money (56%).

 In addition, advisers are struggling to see the wider rationale and reasoning of the regulation – a third (34%) do not think MiFID II is a sensible package of reforms that will improve industry standards.

 A significant number of respondents also think the impact of the regulation on both advisers and investors has thus far been detrimental. Nearly a third of advisers (30%) say MiFID II has had a negative initial impact on the advice industry compared to 21% who think the regulation has been positive. And one quarter (25%) say the initial impact on investors has been negative compared to 17% who say it has been positive.

 Going forward, four in 10 advisers (41%) think MiFID II will result in higher advice fees — significantly higher than the 24% who disagree. And more than a third (36%) agree the regulation will result in a fall in adviser numbers compared to 23% who disagree.

 The most challenging aspect of the regulation for advisers is the disclosure of aggregated costs and charges, cited by two-thirds (65%) of respondents. This is followed by writing suitability reports (32%), recording client conversations (27%) and reporting when a portfolio has dropped 10% or more (23%).

 Advisers think increased market transparency (26%), improved investor confidence and trust (23%) and enhanced investor protections (17%) are the main benefits of MiFID II.

 “Encouragingly, these top three benefits all align to the needs of investors — indicating that advisers are putting clients first and foremost,” added Phillips.

 Meanwhile, advisers have struggled with MiFID II implementation. Three in 10 (29%) say implementation required a lot of work and the same proportion say it was harder than expected. Just 15% say implementation was straightforward and easy.

 The findings indicate a lack of planning and preparation is a major cause of the implementation difficulties. When asked what they would have done differently in terms of MiFID II implementation, seven in 10 (70%) advisers say they would have started to prepare earlier. A quarter (24%) say they would have drawn up a better strategic plan and nearly one in five (18%) would have put more operational resources in place.
   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

The future of investing
Unless you have a reliable crystal ball, there are many aspects of the future which are currently highly uncertain. One element of investing, however,
Open letter on reducing emissions from the built environment
An open letter to UK Government from LGIM’s Head of Sustainability, Head of LGIM Real Assets and CEO of Legal & General Capital
Structured products are an accident waiting to happen
Structured products are an accident waiting to happen for many retirees, with the inflexible terms and conditions of many such products likely to have

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.