Investment - Articles - Neil Woodford and illiquid assets


Celene Lee, Principal and Senior Investment Consultant at pensions and employee benefits consulting firm, Buck, comments:

 “The decision by Kent County Council pension fund to withdraw its £236m investment mandate from the Woodford Equity Income Fund has had damaging consequences, not just for Neil Woodford, but for the fund management industry as a whole. This week’s developments highlight the importance of having a regulatory portfolio cap on investing in illiquid assets. However, it’s important to realise that investing in these assets is not, and should not, be considered as unnecessarily risky.

 Illiquid assets can help investors meet their long-term investment strategy, and also provide potentially higher returns and diversification of their investment portfolio. Clearly, getting the balance right between illiquid and easy-to-sell assets is vital, but for investors who fully understand their investment objectives and appreciate the market and the risks involved, illiquidity should not be a dirty word.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Farmers get pre Christmas IHT reprieve
Rathbones and Utmost Wealth comment as the government announced that the level of the Agricultural and Business Property Reliefs threshold will be inc
Economy grinding to a halt as spectre of recession looms
Comment from Lindsay James, investment strategist at Quilter, on the latest UK GDP quarterly national accounts data
Inheritance Tax revenue engine on track for record year
This morning’s HMRC update shows that Inheritance Tax (IHT) receipts totalled £5.8 billion through the first eight months of the 2025/26 financial yea

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.