Investment - Articles - Neil Woodford and illiquid assets


Celene Lee, Principal and Senior Investment Consultant at pensions and employee benefits consulting firm, Buck, comments:

 “The decision by Kent County Council pension fund to withdraw its £236m investment mandate from the Woodford Equity Income Fund has had damaging consequences, not just for Neil Woodford, but for the fund management industry as a whole. This week’s developments highlight the importance of having a regulatory portfolio cap on investing in illiquid assets. However, it’s important to realise that investing in these assets is not, and should not, be considered as unnecessarily risky.

 Illiquid assets can help investors meet their long-term investment strategy, and also provide potentially higher returns and diversification of their investment portfolio. Clearly, getting the balance right between illiquid and easy-to-sell assets is vital, but for investors who fully understand their investment objectives and appreciate the market and the risks involved, illiquidity should not be a dirty word.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

IHT and CGT both remain elevated
Inheritance Tax (IHT) receipts in July 2026 totalled £868 million, compared to the £844 million recorded in July 2025. This follows receipts of £871 m
Bond turmoil, debt worries and the squeezed retail consumer
Investors stay wary amid a surge in borrowing costs, while the latest UK retail sales snapshot shows consumers turning more cautious with volumes down
Tinkering with treasuries calms bond and equity markets
Treasury buyback intervention calms nerves, but debt pressures remain. FTSE 100 has a flat start as investors adopt a wait-and-see mode. Fed faces inf

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.