Investment - Articles - Neil Woodford and illiquid assets


Celene Lee, Principal and Senior Investment Consultant at pensions and employee benefits consulting firm, Buck, comments:

 “The decision by Kent County Council pension fund to withdraw its £236m investment mandate from the Woodford Equity Income Fund has had damaging consequences, not just for Neil Woodford, but for the fund management industry as a whole. This week’s developments highlight the importance of having a regulatory portfolio cap on investing in illiquid assets. However, it’s important to realise that investing in these assets is not, and should not, be considered as unnecessarily risky.

 Illiquid assets can help investors meet their long-term investment strategy, and also provide potentially higher returns and diversification of their investment portfolio. Clearly, getting the balance right between illiquid and easy-to-sell assets is vital, but for investors who fully understand their investment objectives and appreciate the market and the risks involved, illiquidity should not be a dirty word.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Trade tensions, Iran sanctions and Shien IPO under pressure
Markets tread water as fresh trade tensions and the threat of tougher Iran sanctions unsettle investors. Brent crude hovers around $93 a barrel as sta
Young adults increasingly turning to AI as a sounding board
Almost half (48%) of Gen Z say AI has changed their mind about a decision, compared with just 2% of the Silent Generation. Nearly a quarter (24%) of G
Actions speak louder than words
The case for a US rate hike is strong, but sequentially softer inflation data makes September less likely, according to James Bilson, Global Fixed Inc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.