Investment - Articles - Neil Woodford and illiquid assets


Celene Lee, Principal and Senior Investment Consultant at pensions and employee benefits consulting firm, Buck, comments:

 “The decision by Kent County Council pension fund to withdraw its £236m investment mandate from the Woodford Equity Income Fund has had damaging consequences, not just for Neil Woodford, but for the fund management industry as a whole. This week’s developments highlight the importance of having a regulatory portfolio cap on investing in illiquid assets. However, it’s important to realise that investing in these assets is not, and should not, be considered as unnecessarily risky.

 Illiquid assets can help investors meet their long-term investment strategy, and also provide potentially higher returns and diversification of their investment portfolio. Clearly, getting the balance right between illiquid and easy-to-sell assets is vital, but for investors who fully understand their investment objectives and appreciate the market and the risks involved, illiquidity should not be a dirty word.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Nvidia's spy bombshell and FTSE gains on Iran talks progress
Allegations about Nvidia boss Jensen Huang's relations with a Chinese spy threaten to disrupt the tech rebound. All eyes will be on the share pri
Tech sell-off spreads as AI fears deepen
Wall Street's tech sell-off has spread with fears mounting that the data centre spending spree could slow just as investors question whether huge
From blue wave to sea of red - Tech rout leads sell off
Comment from Stuart Clark, portfolio manager at Quilter, on the technology-led market sell off: "The blue wave at the ballot box has quickly been repl

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.