Pensions - Articles - Rising cost in pension regulation sparks concern


Research from the Pensions Management Institute’s (PMI) latest PMI Pulse survey reveals that there is concern across the pensions industry around the increasing costs of regulation. Over one third (34%) of pension professionals said they think that the cost of regulation is now too high with 39% of respondents thinking that the cost of regulation is about right. Increasing expenditure of the Department for Work and Pensions’ arm’s length bodies has increased, in turn leading to levy issues, which has led to calls for more transparency over appropriate funding models.

 The Pension Protection Fund has of course recently consulted on the levy but in the PMI’s research, respondents felt that the most appropriate model for funding regulation was a levy based on funds under management (39%), followed by a per member levy (21%), and then by arrangement type (14%).

 Over half (55%) of respondents are dissatisfied with the direction of pension policy thus far and looking into 2020, almost one third (31%) of respondents do not expect the Pensions Regulator (TPR) to focus on the ‘right areas’ over the next six months. However, one third (35%) of respondents are optimistic about the direction of pension policy over the next six months. Now the new Government is in place and once there is more clarity over Brexit, business as usual should hopefully recommence.

 Industry professionals also cited concerns around direct intervention from the Pensions Minister particularly on ESG issues. Guy Opperman’s recent letter at the end of 2019 to the 50 largest pension schemes was met with trepidation by a proportion of respondents. Over one third (37%) thought that the letter set a ‘worrying precedent’ for schemes, given they are likely to have incurred additional costs in meeting the request. However, 26% of respondents welcomed the development and 15% thought it acceptable in this case only.

 Lesley Carline, President, Pensions Management Institute, commented: “While we of course welcome appropriate regulation and an increased focus on ESG across our sector, we need to bear in mind the extra costs this might bear on pension schemes. The protection of scheme members’ funds should remain the top priority and obstacles to achieving positive member outcomes should be thoroughly examined.

 “It is imperative that we see increased transparency around any regulatory costs that may negatively impact the costs of levies for schemes and leave them out of pocket.

 “It’s important that all schemes consider integrating ESG principles into their investment portfolio, although we again recommend that targets are achievable, particularly for smaller schemes with less financial clout.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

The PPF launch the 14th edition of The Purple Book
In its fourteenth edition of The Purple Book, the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) reveals a strong link between investment risk and underfunding in defi
Industry comment on the 14th edition of the PPFs Purple Book
Industry comment from Hymans Robertson Lincoln Pensions and Clara Pensions on the 14th edition of the PPFs Purple Book
Final report of ACA 2019 Pension trends survey
ACA survey report says momentum of pension reform needs to be built upon with plans set out to increase automatic enrolment minimum contributions alon

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.