Pensions - Articles - Willis Towers Watson comment on tPR's DB funding statement


The Pensions Regulator has published its annual defined benefit funding statement. This is particularly relevant to pension schemes undergoing actuarial valuations with effective dates in the year to 21 September 2016 (typically December 2015 or March/April 2016). Most schemes undergo a valuation every three years, with the trustees and sponsoring employer agreeing a new plan to repair any deficit.

 Commenting on the statement and accompanying analysis, Graham McLean, a senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson, said: “The Regulator says it ‘may be affordable’ for the majority of employers to clear shortfalls according to previously agreed timetables. In about half of cases, annual payments would need to at least double for that to be achieved. Even recognising that increases at the lower end of the range are most likely to be affordable, the Regulator appears to want some big contribution rises to be up for discussion.* “The contributions required will vary a lot between employers, and so will the affordability of these contributions. Many firms may want to argue that their circumstances make them the exception to the rule, and the Regulator has in any case stopped short of saying that most employers will be able to increase contributions enough to avoid any lengthening of recovery periods.

 “Nonetheless, the suggestion that many employers should potentially double their annual payments towards clearing pension deficits marks a change in tone from the Regulator.

 “When schemes facing new actuarial valuations last went through this process in 2013, the Treasury had recently announced that it was ‘taking action to shift the balance of regulation in favour of private sector investment and growth,’** and that the Regulator would be given a new objective to reflect this. The Regulator followed this up by saying that ‘as a starting point, trustees should consider whether the current level of contributions can be maintained.’*** Considering whether contributions can rise enough to put the existing recovery plan back on track is a very different place to start.

 “Funding pension schemes involves walking a tightrope: trustees want deficits to be dealt with as quickly as possible but without undermining the businesses that they will rely on in future. Employers have recently been given more flexibility; the regulatory pendulum may now be swinging back the other way.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Rising costs of TPS and STPS burdening independent schools
Over 400 independent schools have left the Teacher’s Pension Scheme (TPS) since 20191. TPS cost increases make it less financially viable. Independent
Government and Regulator give schemes impetus on endgame
Building on LCP’s new Accounting for Pensions 2025 report that was released last month, the latest results by LCP’s Pensions Explorer at 31 May 2025 s
Index shows gender differences in pension trust and outlook
Trafalgar House has unveiled new findings from their fifth Trust & Confidence Index of the pensions industry, revealing a significant gender divide in

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.