Investment - Articles - Investors should double down on their stewardship strategies


Investors must refocus their stewardship efforts to ensure to ensure that their interests are properly aligned with those of their partners, and to protect their rights as asset owners. Without a strong focus, they may miss opportunities to challenge any proposals that affect their rights, warns Hymans Robertson.

 Political pressure and regulatory change are eroding asset owner rights with some in the asset management community adjusting their stance towards responsible investment. Against this backdrop, it essential for asset owners to reassert their beliefs and be clear on their expectations of others, including asset managers. Strong engagement with asset managers can be used to test the alignment of interests and ensure that stewardship efforts are being properly focused.

 Commenting on why investors should double-down on their stewardship strategies now, Chris O’Bryen, Investment Associate Consultant, Stewardship Lead, Hymans Robertson, says: “Stewardship and responsible investment are facing significant challenge. Over the last few years, we have seen a raft of policy changes from governments that have had a direct impact on how some in the investment world approach responsible investing.

 “We’ve also seen updates to the UK Stewardship Code that mean asset owners will have to do work harder to protect and assert their rights. The new Code comes into effect in 2026, while the focus is on more effective stewardship, it now includes tailored principles and allows for flexibility in style and frequency of reporting. Without uniform reporting, investors will have to increase their level of due diligence when selecting an asset manager. This will ensure that the partner they choose is fully aligned with their goals and beliefs, and will act to help them assert their rights.”

 Commenting on how asset manager selection processes are even more critical for investors now, O’Bryen adds: “It’s no secret that some asset managers are responding to the current ‘ESG backlash’. The changes to the Code, the tailored principles and flexibility in reporting format in particular, could see those that have changed their approach in-line with the backlash movement, become signatories. This means, once the updated Code comes into effect, signatory status alone may not be a strong enough indicator of an asset manager’s capabilities, approach or beliefs. Investors will need to dig deeper when doing their due diligence to select or retain a manager. Ensuring that their knowledge of evolving events remains current through regular training is key to maintaining oversight and exerting control. Without this, they may find that they choose or retain a manager that takes decisions that inadvertently curtail their rights as asset owners.” 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

K3 Advisory completes buyin for Terex Pension Scheme
K3, part of Isio, has successfully led a buy-in transaction with Aviva for the Terex Pension Scheme - the UK subsidiary of Terex Corporation, a globa
Rates set for a cut next week with another before Christmas
The market expects UK interest rates to be cut from 4.25% to 4% next week. It’s also expecting one more cut by the end of the year, possibly in Novemb
Industry comments as IHT net spreads further still
Utmost Wealth Solutions and Just Group comment as more estates were pulled into the IHT net long before the Government’s changes to the IHT regime at

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.