Pensions - Articles - 60 percent of pension schemes have a Net Zero target


83% of £5bn+ pension schemes have set a Net Zero target by 2050, compared to only 35% of £1bn+ schemes. Amongst the £5bn+ schemes setting a Net Zero target, 73% had a clear plan to achieve the objective, compared to only 17% of the £1bn+ group.

 Where reported, the average Implied Temperature Rise of scheme holdings was 2.80C, suggesting schemes are holdings assets which are not aligned to the climate transition

 67% of £5bn+ schemes have now introduced climate-aware funds, and 61% are directly financing climate solutions

 44% of £5bn+ schemes say they are not on track to meet the climate related targets they set in 2022

 A new report by XPS Pensions Group reviewed the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)-aligned climate disclosures of 35 pension schemes, totalling £344bn AUM, relating to schemes above £1bn. These are the second such round of TCFD disclosures published after reporting was made mandatory for schemes with over £5bn in 2021 and for schemes with over £1bn in 2022.

 More of the largest schemes have a net zero target and a greater proportion, versus smaller schemes, have a clear plan to deliver on the target:

 
 Progress is being made amongst schemes to manage climate risks, with most having made changes to their portfolio to include climate-aware objectives into their mandates and to finance climate solutions more directly. XPS’ view is that TCFD has been instrumental in bringing climate change to the attention of pension scheme trustees and is the first step to successfully managing climate risks.

 There is still room for improvement though, with more focus needed on transition alignment beyond carbon emissions reduction where most of the attention is currently. XPS calculated a weighted average of reported Implied Temperature Rise of 2.8°C, indicating schemes are holding assets which are misaligned with the climate transition.

 Furthermore, shortcomings have been highlighted in relation to stress testing the financial impacts of physical risks in a high global warming scenario. Additionally, as TCFD requires schemes to undertake scenario analysis every 3 years, the research found that 56% of £5bn+ schemes chose not to undertake analysis this year, and many of those who did undertake scenario modelling indicated that they did not find meaningful conclusions from the analysis.

 The report concluded with four recommendations for scheme trustees including engaging in ongoing training to understand the latest TCFD developments, speaking to pensions consultants on enhancing their climate strategy, assessing the transition alignments across their portfolios and considering the increasing range of funds with embedded climate objectives.

 Alex Quant, Head of ESG Research at XPS Pensions Group, said: “TCFD has been pivotal in bringing climate change to the attention of pension scheme trustees. Many schemes have made good progress to address climate risks in their portfolios, but the majority must place more focus on transition alignment in order to better contribute to real-world change.”
  

 XPS Net Zero Report

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.