Pensions - Articles - ACA warns of inadvertent damage to pension advice market


The Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA) has welcomed HMRC’s initiative to improve standards in the “tax advice” market but made it clear in its response to an HMRC consultation that this should not be at the expense of inadvertently damaging the pension advice market or the provision of high-quality information to scheme members.

 ACA Chair, Patrick Bloomfield, commented: “HMRC is looking to find an extremely wide definition of “tax advice”. This is understandable as it means promoters of tax avoidance schemes cannot hide behind a label of offering “guidance” rather than “tax advice”.

 However, given the complexity of pensions tax rules, such a definition could inadvertently capture a wide element of the industry helping the day-to-day delivery of pension schemes. This could significantly inconvenience scheme members and bring pensions professionals into regulations primarily designed with traditional tax advisers and their clients in mind.”

 ACA Pensions Tax Committee Vice-Chair, Tim Sexton, added: “ACA is also concerned it could become difficult to communicate with trustees, employers or members effectively without encroaching on a wide view of tax advice. Any policy regulating tax advice should not interrupt the high quality advice given by pension professionals, interfere with the good running of pension schemes, or interfere with the Pension Regulator’s aim that pension schemes give members as full as possible information to understand their rights and options.“

 In its latest consultation, HMRC has proposed using professional indemnity insurance (PII) as a tool which might remove some advisers from the market, and then provide fallback for compensation to customers who suffer from badly given tax advice.

 The ACA has suggested that if HMRC intends to make PII cover mandatory across the very diverse range of advisers who comment on tax matters to clients then the policy should:
 • focus on protecting personal customers and small business customers (rather than larger businesses which already tend to have strong procurement processes).
 • avoid duplicating equivalent requirements already imposed by professional bodies or statutory regulators, and construct simple coverage requirements for smaller unaffiliated tax agents serving individuals and small businesses.
 • target providing appropriate protection for shortcomings by an adviser rather than imposing a uniform amount and design of PII across the whole market.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Covenant is crucial to any pension schemes risk management
Emily Goodridge, Managing Director, Cardano, a business of Marsh McLennan, said: “Covenant is a crucial element of any pension scheme’s risk managemen
TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.