Pensions - Articles - Alternative strategies for DB pension buyouts considered


PwC’s Buyout Index recorded a surplus of £210bn in July, showing that schemes continue to have sufficient assets on average to ‘buyout’ their pension promises.

 Meanwhile, the Low Reliance Index also continues to show a sizable surplus of £350bn. This index assumes schemes invest in low-risk, income-generating assets like bonds, meaning they are unlikely to call on the sponsor for further funding.

 For the UK’s DB pension schemes who can’t afford to buyout, many may be looking towards Superfunds as a potential long-term solution.
 
 John Dunn, head of pensions funding and transformation at PwC, said: “July was an action-packed month for pensions initiatives, with a number of consultations, consultation outcomes, plans and calls for evidence launched following the Chancellor's Mansion House speech. In contrast, the funding position of the UK’s DB schemes has been reassuringly uneventful; DB schemes remain well funded as has been the case for many months now.

 “Among these announcements, the Department for Work and Pensions published a response to its 2018 consultation on Consolidation of Defined Benefit Pension Schemes. We agree that vehicles such as Superfunds could provide a valuable alternative to insurance for sponsors and trustees that find that full buyout is unaffordable. However, whether or not Superfunds will support the Government’s vision, to harness the substantial assets of UK pension schemes to stimulate economic growth by investing in productive assets, will depend on the risk appetite of both investors and regulators.”
 
 Matt Cooper, head of alternative pension solutions at PwC, added: “One of the key challenges for the Superfund market getting off the ground has been the cost of transactions. Under the current regulations there hasn’t been much difference between the cost of insurance buy-in and transferring a scheme to a Superfund - so pension schemes that had been exploring Superfunds ended up going to insurers. The changes proposed in the consultation response are expected to lower the cost of transferring to a Superfund to around 90% of the cost of insurance buyout. While a lower cost may make these solutions more attractive, trustees will need to understand the level of security these solutions are now offering.

 “With an increasing number of schemes exploring insurance solutions given improvements in funding, a live poll at our most recent Virtual Ideas Exchange event found that one in five pension schemes who recently approached the insurance market are now struggling to get engagement from insurers to quote for them.

 “Superfunds and other Capital Backed Funding Arrangements may represent a lower cost solution for less well funded pension schemes to explore, as a means for enhancing member outcomes and allowing the employer a means to manage their legacy pension liabilities.”
  

 The PwC Low Reliance Index and PwC Buyout Index figures are as follows:
 
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

94 percent view State Pension as an entitlement not benefit
Majority of adults aged 66+ say that Triple Lock is affordable and fair to older generations. Around one in seven rely on the State Pension to provide
Fair play off the pitch
Male players in the English Premier League earn an average of more than £3 million per year, while their female counterparts average around £47,000. T
Why Bitcoin matters to Pension Schemes
Back in November 2024, Cartwright Pension Trusts announced its role in facilitating the first-ever UK DB pension trust investment in Bitcoin. With the

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.