Pensions - Articles - Barnett Waddingham support move to single regulator


Commenting on the Work and Pensions Select Committee Report published this morning, Barnett Waddingham senior consultant Malcolm McLean says:

 “I would be very supportive of the suggestion of moving to a single regulator sooner rather than later.
 
 “With both auto-enrolment and the pension freedoms at critical stages of development it makes no sense to proceed as we are. A single regulator will provide a clear focus for direct action and early intervention where necessary. We are constantly hearing from either TPR or the FCA about the need to consult one another on a range of activities. This is not only inefficient it is positively dangerous.
 
 “A single regulator would be less confusing for consumers, would help to plug gaps in the current arrangements and provide greater consistency of treatment between trust based and contract based schemes.
 
 “With greater foresight this should have happened before now, probably a year or more ago at the time the FCA was formed and the functions of banking and financial services regulation were separated. The fact it didn’t probably owed more to a struggle for power and influence between the two owning government departments (DWP and Treasury) than for any good operational reasons and even now the FCA will not be keen on giving up part of its patch. The time for prevaricating, however, is over and a decision needs to be made. There is too much at stake to let this drag on much longer.
 
 “I am also generally in favour of the idea of an independent commission along the lines of the 2005/06 Turner Commission. Apart from anything else this would provide a breathing space after the recent upheavals and allow considered expert analysis of the workings of the massive changes brought in and the future direction of travel required. It is perhaps a vain hope that such a commission would be fully independent and totally unconstrained by political influences but it should be given a free rein to express views and make recommendations which hopefully a new government of whatever political persuasion would feel able to accept.
 
 “Overall a very good report from the W&P Committee which realistically I doubt will be acted upon this side of the general election. However hopefully it will not be left to gather dust on the shelf for an indeterminate period and will be resurrected and acted upon by the new government as soon as possible thereafter”.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.