Pensions - Articles - Broadstone comments on Steve Webb's scepticism


Broadstone comments on Steve Webb’s scepticism about a larger role for income protection

 Robin Watkins, Risk and Flexible Benefits Consultant at Broadstone, says:
 “Steve Webb’s scepticism on the Government subsidising Income Protection policies is interesting, but as he implies, it is likely to be the best employers who offer the protection to their key asset: their staff.
  
 “At a corporate level, skills shortages in many industries are making employers look at staff motivation, and while salary is a key consideration when it comes to a change of employer (or remaining with an existing employer), our own research has shown that the provision of benefits, including those related to sickness absence, are potentially more important to many, whether fully company funded or not.
  
 “The paternalistic aspect leaves a feel-good factor within a business too, but at a time where responsibility and self sufficiency are being pushed onto employers - and in turn employees - it is arguably a natural progression to consider offering this type of benefit.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

DC Pension Tracker Q3 2025
The Aon UK DC Pension Tracker fell over the quarter, with the younger savers seeing decreases in their expected outcomes, while the older members’ exp
Employers must take lead in retirement adequacy crisis
Employers will end up taking most of the responsibility for helping to solve the retirement adequacy problem if we are to see real and impactful chang
Two thirds of Administrators involved in pension strategy
With forthcoming legislation, from Inheritance Tax on unused pension pots to the 2025 Pension Schemes Bill set to have considerable implications for p

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.