Pensions - Articles - Comment on Hughes v Royal London Group


Commenting on the judgement in the case Hughes v. Royal London Group a Royal London spokesman said:

 “Pensions Liberation and pensions fraud raise serious concerns for providers like Royal London. We therefore take transfer requests very seriously and look out for the warning signs highlighted by the Regulators and relevant guidance. In spite of what we might find, if a customer has a statutory right to a transfer then there is very little we can do if the customer wants to proceed. The transfer must be allowed.

 This judgement provides greater clarity on the circumstances which determine when that statutory right exists and we will obviously comply with the Court Order relating to Ms Hughes’ transfer.
 
 Royal London’s concern has only ever been to comply with the Regulatory guidance and to assist our policyholders to avoid circumstances where they risk losing all or part of their pension benefits.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

DC Pension Tracker Q3 2025
The Aon UK DC Pension Tracker fell over the quarter, with the younger savers seeing decreases in their expected outcomes, while the older members’ exp
Employers must take lead in retirement adequacy crisis
Employers will end up taking most of the responsibility for helping to solve the retirement adequacy problem if we are to see real and impactful chang
Two thirds of Administrators involved in pension strategy
With forthcoming legislation, from Inheritance Tax on unused pension pots to the 2025 Pension Schemes Bill set to have considerable implications for p

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.