Pensions - Articles - Comment on Hughes v Royal London Group


Commenting on the judgement in the case Hughes v. Royal London Group a Royal London spokesman said:

 “Pensions Liberation and pensions fraud raise serious concerns for providers like Royal London. We therefore take transfer requests very seriously and look out for the warning signs highlighted by the Regulators and relevant guidance. In spite of what we might find, if a customer has a statutory right to a transfer then there is very little we can do if the customer wants to proceed. The transfer must be allowed.

 This judgement provides greater clarity on the circumstances which determine when that statutory right exists and we will obviously comply with the Court Order relating to Ms Hughes’ transfer.
 
 Royal London’s concern has only ever been to comply with the Regulatory guidance and to assist our policyholders to avoid circumstances where they risk losing all or part of their pension benefits.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Professional Trustee appointments increase by 8 percent
Growth in the number of Professional Trustee (PT) appointments continued over the last 12 months, although at a slower rate than previously seen as th
Working from home could boost your retirement pot
Standard Life analysis highlights how directing savings made from working from home and not commuting could lead to a significantly bigger retirement
6 out of 10 pension dippers shun free Pension Wise guidance
FCA Financial Lives survey shows 59% accessing pensions don’t use the guidance service. Just Group says ‘stronger nudge’ to guidance still too weak

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.