General Insurance Article - Comment on the insurance steering group on pandemic response


Mactavish is highly critical of the formation of a new UK Insurance Industry Steering Group looking at how the sector should respond to the current Coronavirus crisis and future pandemics. It believes it will become little more than a PR gimmick.

 Bruce Hepburn, CEO, Mactavish said: “In terms of pandemics, SARS and MERS means the industry has had ‘trial runs’ to learn from, but still it failed to make itself sufficiently relevant to this crisis.

 “The sector has failed in its response to Coronavirus and by the time this new steering group makes any recommendations, thousands of businesses will have gone bust. It’s a cynical ploy and PR gimmick to help draw attention away from its failings unless it focuses more on how it can help right now.

 “The steering group’s current membership consists solely of insurance professionals, meaning it’s a little like marking your own homework. Will they really hold the industry to account and shine a proper light on its failings and make the radical recommendations for change that the sector needs, or will they simply pass the buck on to the government?”

 “Why wasn’t this group formed to look at this risk after SARS, MERS and the other trial runs the World has had? This problem needs to be solved by a new generation of people with a different perspective on the role of insurance in society”.

 Mactavish says that the problems which have been laid bare during the crisis are not new. A long-term focus on price over value of cover has led to considerable erosion of insurance contract quality, growing opacity around broker fee structures and an increasing one-size-fits-all approach to complex risks.

 On 4th March prior to the crisis and the insurance industry response, Mactavish rather presciently launched its own Reform Agenda to expose the failed direction of travel of the industry over the last 20 years in terms of insurance contract quality and fitness for purpose.

 The document states: “It is our contention that erosion of contract quality, opacity around broker fee structures and one-size-fits-all approaches to complex risks are having a detrimental impact on the value of insurance to the real economy and the reputation of the industry.

 “Over the last thirty or forty years, the commercial insurance market has made a collective strategic error. By marketing insurance as a price-driven commodity it sowed the seeds of its current difficulties. A complex financial instrument capable of preserving or breaking a company’s balance sheet has been sold as if it were essentially interchangeable. All too often, policyholders only realise that this is not the case when they have a claim reduced or denied unexpectedly - causing real economic damage and further tarnishing the reputation of our industry.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Call for simplification of EU cybersecurity regulation
Insurance Europe has welcomed the European Commission’s review of the Cybersecurity Act (CSA) and the forthcoming digital omnibus initiative, supporti
7 California wildfire lessons learnt for European insurers
The devastating January 2025 wildfires in Los Angeles, which destroyed over 16 000 structures and caused insured losses of approximately USD 40 billio
Do not be left high and dry this summer
Aviva is urging caution as data reveals a correlation between warm weather and fire claims. Number of garden fire claims is already significantly high

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.