Pensions - Articles - Comment on the non-existent uptake of LISA by banks


David Brooks, Technical Director at Broadstone says: The decision by banks not to embrace LISA must be a concern for the Government and certainly does not represent the most exciting of starts.

 On the face of it LISA’s advantages (top-up equal to basic rate tax relief and the ability to use it for both home purchase or pension) has a number of advantages to the consumer. This in turn should be attractive to providers such as banks, particularly given the rumours that an adaptation of LISA may underpin future pension provision and therefore act as a gateway to a much bigger commercial opportunity.
 
 “It is likely that the banks decision is informed by their own research that suggests consumers are currently ambivalent about LISA and they possibly share consumers concerns around the penalties that can exist on withdrawal. This might raise the spectre of potential mis-selling which, with PPI still looming large, may dampen the appetite for banks to fully embrace LISA
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Practical steps to support younger workers pension saving
Three quarters (74%) of employers worry employees will not save enough for retirement as living costs squeeze disposable income. A similar proportion
Two thirds use salary sacrifice but most unaware of 2029 cap
Nearly two-thirds of UK workers (62%) are using salary sacrificeA similar number (63%) are unaware it will be capped from 2029Nearly one in ten (9%)
The year of the DC Default
All DC default pension providers delivered positive returns in 2025, supported by strong performance across all major asset classes. 71% of providers

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.