Pensions - Articles - Comment on the non-existent uptake of LISA by banks


David Brooks, Technical Director at Broadstone says: The decision by banks not to embrace LISA must be a concern for the Government and certainly does not represent the most exciting of starts.

 On the face of it LISA’s advantages (top-up equal to basic rate tax relief and the ability to use it for both home purchase or pension) has a number of advantages to the consumer. This in turn should be attractive to providers such as banks, particularly given the rumours that an adaptation of LISA may underpin future pension provision and therefore act as a gateway to a much bigger commercial opportunity.
 
 “It is likely that the banks decision is informed by their own research that suggests consumers are currently ambivalent about LISA and they possibly share consumers concerns around the penalties that can exist on withdrawal. This might raise the spectre of potential mis-selling which, with PPI still looming large, may dampen the appetite for banks to fully embrace LISA
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.