Pensions - Articles - DB transfer complainants likely to receive no compensation


Rising gilt yields and falling asset values drive significant decline in redress for a typical DB transfer complainant

 Typical DB transfer complainant now likely to receive no compensation
 
 The quarterly Defined Benefit (DB) Redress Tracker from leading independent financial services consultancy Broadstone provides an indicator of the level of compensation due to those who were previously ill-advised to transfer out of their DB pension.

 Broadstone’s DB Redress Tracker follows the example of an individual who left their scheme in 2018 aged 50, with a pension of £10,000 p.a. which would receive inflation-linked increases when in payment. The Tracker is developed in line with Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules for calculating redress with the individual assumed to have invested their funds to earn returns in line with the FTSE Private Investor Index.

 The latest update shows that compensation for a typical pension transfer redress case continues to fall and in many (or even most) cases, there may not be any redress payable. This trend continued at pace in 2024 and accelerated in Q4 2024 as gilt yields rose markedly, decreasing the assessed value of the transferred DB liabilities while asset values rose further. With financial conditions softening and rates rising, the Redress Tracker demonstrates the radical decline in potential DB redress since the start of 2022 when average compensation for the use case was above £150,000.

 

 The range within which redress can fall will depend on the generosity of the original transfer value and the investment performance since but it is now becoming more common for there to be no redress payable in many cases.

 Brian Nimmo, Head of Redress Solutions at Broadstone, said: “The changing economic environment has driven a sea-change in DB transfer redress, primarily due to the influence of increasing gilt yields. There will now be many cases where no loss is experienced for those transferring out of their DB pension due to effective investment performance and the size of the original transfer value. As our Redress Tracker demonstrates, this is a radically difficult scenario from just a couple of years ago when our average complainant could have been entitled to over a hundred thousand pounds.

 “However, it is also true that many individuals still face losses requiring redress and, with the potential requirements of CP23/24 coming down the line, it is important that financial advisers are preparing appropriately. This is likely to require expert, specialist advice and actuarial support to help them scope out how much capital is needed to be set aside for possible claims.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Drive to mega funds not in scheme members best interest
The drive to ‘mega funds’ in the DC market is the wrong place to focus to deliver the government’s aim of generating more economic growth according to
TPR could play leading role promoting sustainable growth
With leaders of the UK’s main economic regulators due to be called in to Downing Street on Thursday to explain how they will contribute to the governm
Pension consolidation must be based on VFM not asset size
TPT Retirement Solutions believes consolidation in the DC pension sector should focus on improving outcomes for members, rather than solely looking to

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.