![]() |
A Hymans Robertson survey has revealed that 42% of defined contribution (DC) Trustees believe that DC investment strategies lack the sophistication of those used in defined benefit (DB). Half (50%) of those also agreed that it will take at least 10 years for them to catch up, with the majority (40%) saying this would never happen. |
The survey, commissioned by the independent pensions and benefits consultancy, also found that trustees of larger schemes were generally more optimistic about DC’s ability to catch up. Nearly three-quarters (43%) of Trustees managing schemes with assets of less than £100 million believed that DC would never be as sophisticated as DB. While over a third (37%) of Trustees for larger schemes (assets over £100 million) felt that this could happen within the next five years. Raj Shah, Head of DC Investment at Hymans Robertson commented on the results: “It’s difficult to ignore how much the DC investment landscape has evolved in the three years since pension freedoms were introduced and the results of our research make it clear that DC strategies fall behind DB in terms of sophistication. “The sheer scale of assets enjoyed by DB schemes provides them with greater scope for sophistication and innovation, so much so that even the largest DC trust schemes that exist today would struggle to enter into the same investments. Despite this, I wasn’t surprised to see greater optimism amongst those Trustees managing larger DC schemes than those working with smaller schemes. Schemes with less than £100m in assets are likely to struggle adopting more sophisticated strategies as they will be unable to receive the benefits of scale enjoyed by those with larger pools of assets. “Thankfully, the DC evolution is not showing any signs of slowing down and I can certainly see a light at the end of the tunnel. As long as the scale of assets in DC continues to grow and access to alternative asset classes widens, then sophistication in DC investment will improve. While price and contribution to risk-adjusted return will still be the major factors to consider when selecting an asset class, it is refreshing to see that DC product development is steadily gaining traction.” |
|
|
|
BPA Implementation Manager | ||
North / hybrid working 50/50 - Negotiable |
Head of Reserving | ||
City of London - £150,000 Per Annum |
PRT or BPA Specialist | ||
Nationwide offices / hybrid working - Negotiable |
Retirement Consultant | ||
UK-wide / hybrid 2 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
GI Associate Actuarial Director | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
GI Actuarial Senior Manager | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Actuarial Manager - GI/Risk | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Insurance Risk Manager | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Financial Risk Leader - ALM Oversight | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
Financial Risk Leader | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
Take the lead on actuarial financial ... | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
With-Profits and Investment Risk Expert | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
Reinsurance Actuary | ||
London/Hybrid - Negotiable |
CONTRACT (12 months): Underwriter | ||
Fully remote - Negotiable |
CONTRACT (12 months): Senior Underwriter | ||
Fully remote - Negotiable |
MI Manager | ||
UK South West / hybrid 2 days in the office - Negotiable |
Senior MI Analyst | ||
UK South West / hybrid 2 days in the office - Negotiable |
LONDON MARKET CONTRACT: Capital Model... | ||
London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Senior M&A Actuary | ||
London / hybrid 3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Market-leading Pricing | ||
South East or Scotland / hybrid 2 dpw in the office - Negotiable |
Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.