Pensions - Articles - Defined ambition pension plans welcomed by Mercer


 Mercer welcomed the Government’s Reinvigorating Workplace Pensions proposal which aims to rebuild confidence in workplace pensions and bridge the divide between defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) pension schemes, by introducing defined ambition schemes. According to the consultancy, risk-sharing between employer and employee and pushing for higher saving are admirable goals, but their success will rely upon ensuring that people saving for retirement understand the way risk and cost is balanced between themselves, their employer and the government, and making sure that future governments refrain from moving the goalposts.
 
 Looking at the practicalities of building a workable compromise between DB and DC, Glyn Bradley, Actuary in Mercer’s Retirement, Risk and Finance business warns, “Striking a balance has to be at the heart of designing new schemes. If risk sharing is to work the Government needs to focus on the kind of schemes which employers really want to offer to employees and the products which insurers are actually prepared to offer to savers. Equally, we need simple products that savers feel they can understand. It’s futile legislating for savings vehicles that no-one will actually offer, or, pay into.”
  
 Mr Bradley added, “The nature of the pension promise should not be at the heart of the debate. We could argue for defined benefit, defined contribution or defined ambition until the cows come home, but all this is secondary to how much money is actually put in the pension pot.”
  
 “The number one reason why many members of DC schemes may end up with low pensions is that little money is being put into them in the first place, relative to members’ retirement objectives. Unless this fundamental point is recognised, then no matter how a scheme is designed, it will not provide for the pension which workers, their employers or the Government are striving for. Whilst the intention behind guarantees and insurance is to protect returns, these options inevitably come with a price tag, for either the member or their employer and may simply guarantee low pay outs.”
  
 Dina McDonald, Principal in Mercer’s Retirement, Risk and Finance business warned, “Risk-sharing between employer and employee is, on the face of it, an attractive proposition but employers are likely to be wary. Many of today’s private sector final salary schemes started off as ‘defined ambition’ packages, with targets, aspirations and safety valves, but few guarantees. But the ‘ambition’ element has fizzled out over the last 25 years as policy has been shaped and reshaped by successive governments, increasingly providing more certainty to members and leaving employers to pick up the tab. As a result, companies have increasingly sought to pass on all of the risk to employees, leaving the legacy of a very polarised pensions landscape. The success of any new ‘defined ambition’ schemes will depend upon future UK governments protecting the middle ground between DB and DC.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

94 percent view State Pension as an entitlement not benefit
Majority of adults aged 66+ say that Triple Lock is affordable and fair to older generations. Around one in seven rely on the State Pension to provide
Fair play off the pitch
Male players in the English Premier League earn an average of more than £3 million per year, while their female counterparts average around £47,000. T
Why Bitcoin matters to Pension Schemes
Back in November 2024, Cartwright Pension Trusts announced its role in facilitating the first-ever UK DB pension trust investment in Bitcoin. With the

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.