Pensions - Articles - FCA decision on FOS limits has implications for DB advice


comment from Steven Cameron, Pensions Director at Aegon, on the implications for advice on DB transfers following the FCA’s decision to increase the Financial Ombudsman Service compensation limit to £350k from £150k.

 “Increasing the maximum compensation the FOS can grant from £150k to £350k will benefit a small number of individuals facing major losses, for example as a result of poor advice. Unfortunately, what is good news for this very small group of individuals could be bad news for the many thousands more who are seeking advice on whether it is in their interests to transfer out of a defined benefit pension. This is because the FCA’s decision is likely to have a major implications for the cost of advice. Financial advice is a requirement for anyone with a DB pension worth more than £30,000 so it’s essential people have access to advice, particularly as transferring won’t be the right thing to do for most people. 

 “The FCA suggests the changes could mean firms currently offering advice on DB transfers could face a 140% increase in already very expensive Professional Indemnity cover. This will inevitably lead to increased costs passed to customers. But even more worrying, the FCA predicts 1000 of the 2500 firms currently offering such advice will stop doing so. Neither of these developments are good news for customers needing professional advice.

 “The FCA highlights that the number of people building up defined benefit pensions is diminishing. But there are still huge numbers who have previous entitlements which they might be considering transferring, for example to access pension freedoms. While there has been a recent drop in transfer activity, this is at least partly down to the lack of supply of advice, and shouldn’t be interpreted as a decline in demand.
 
 “Well-intentioned action to compensate customers who’ve lost out as a result of poor advice could unfortunately create real problems for the vast majority of highly professional advisers wanting to meet their clients’ needs for advice on DB transfers. It’s vital that the FCA monitors closely the impacts of their decision and how PI insurers react. Otherwise, there could be widespread consumer detriment with thousands of individuals unable to get advice on what’s best for their retirement provision.”

 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.