Pensions - Articles - FCA delays changes to DB Pension Transfer rules


Long-awaited changes to the FCA’s rules around Defined Benefit pension transfers have been delayed by up to six months according to information just posted on the FCA’s website.

 The FCA has been looking into the DB transfer market since the volume of transfers surged after the introduction of Pension Freedoms in 2015. It had raised concerns about the high volume of transfer advice which it regarded as ‘unsuitable’ and has stepped up its data collection and investigation of individual firms. The issue also received a lot of attention in the last Parliament from the Work and Pensions Select Committee, not least in light of poor advice given to some members of the British Steel Pension Scheme.

 In July 2019 the FCA published its final proposals to reform DB transfer advice (CP19/25) which included plans to ban ‘contingent’ charging (ie charging more for advice if a transfer goes ahead) with limited exceptions, to introduce a new form of ‘abridged’ advice, and to crack down on high ongoing charges post transfer.

 The implementation of these changes had been expected imminently, and until yesterday the FCA website said: “We will consider the feedback we receive on this Consultation Paper and publish our finalised Handbook text in a Policy Statement in the first quarter of 2020”.

 But yesterday the FCA changed its webpage to say:“We will publish our finalised Handbook text in a Policy Statement in the second quarter or third quarter of 2020”.

 As a result of this, changes to the rules around DB transfer advice could be delayed by up to 6 months.

 Commenting, Clive Harrison, partner at pensions consultants LCP said: “The DB advice market is very diverse with a mix of high quality advice sitting alongside cases where the FCA finds that members have clearly been given unsuitable advice. If the FCA believes that the consumer detriment from poor quality advice runs into billions of pounds, it is very disappointing that measures designed to improve the advice market have been delayed. Given the particular concerns in the current Covid-19 environment about pension scheme members being vulnerable to scammers, and poor quality advisers taking advantage of members’ fears, it is vital that consumer protection measures are maintained as far as possible, despite the present situation”.
   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.