Pensions - Articles - FSCP report into annuities does not go far enough


 While the release of a report by the Financial Services Consumer Panel (FSCP) should continue to raise the issues surrounding excessive commission and fees charged for non-advised annuities, investment business Skandia believes that it does not go far enough in considering consumers’ needs as they approach retirement.

 An annuity is just one option available to a consumer when they are assessing their income needs in retirement, and it is important that the public understands that as soon as possible.

 Adrian Walker, Skandia's retirement planning managerAdrian Walker, retirement planning manager at Skandia, comments: “The FSCP report has done a great job at heightening the sense of fear the public has when considering how to provide retirement income from their pension savings.

 “It should be remembered that, in the right situation, at the right time, the right annuity product will still be a sensible choice for the consumer. The main reason the report contributes to the fear factor is that it doesn’t go far enough. It does not consider the need to make consumers aware of their alternatives, which will further cement the public’s belief that their pensions equal ‘rip-off’ annuities and vice versa.

 “It will be very important, if any of the proposals outlined in this report are to be taken forward, that the proposed code of conduct includes clear information about non-annuity options as a high priority.

 “Such information needs to explore other courses of action that a person can take to delay the decision to buy an annuity, including continuing to work, using their pension savings initially to provide income through a capped drawdown facility, or using other savings, such as ISAs to provide part, or all of their immediate income needs.

 “We agree that the path to purchasing the right annuity should be controlled and the associated costs transparently disclosed, but firmly believe that across all ‘at retirement’ communications there should be a clear message that buying an annuity is not the only course of action. How to turn their pension savings into retirement income is one of the most important financial decisions a person has to make. Scaring consumers at a point in their lives when they need sensible, good quality financial advice, or provision of clear and understandable educational information to allow them to make the right decision, is not the way to go about it.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.