Pensions - Articles - FTSE 100 companies will see tough pension negotiations


According to JLT Employee Benefits the next six months will see approximately one third of FTSE 100 pension schemes undergo tough negotiations with their sponsors as they attempt to secure higher cash contributions following their actuarial valuation. Company directors will be stuck between a rock and a hard place, trying to balance the opposing interests of the two stakeholder groups.

 Actuarial valuations typically take place every three years in order to reassess defined benefit (DB) pension deficits and liabilities, using up-to-date economic assumptions. Over the last decade, pension deficits and liabilities have been worsening due to the low interest rate, low bond yield environment, leading trustees to call for greater contributions from the sponsoring company.

 Whilst this is part of a long term trend, this year is plagued by additional economic uncertainty brought about by Brexit and the UK general election, with increased market volatility affecting pension funding positions negatively.

 Companies with large pension liabilities that are currently or imminently carrying out an actuarial valuation include BAE Systems, BT, GlaxoSmithKline, Lloyds Banking Group, Standard Life and Tesco. Some of these have pension liabilities worth more than the company’s equity value, a position that could make trustees and shareholders equally nervous.

 Whilst several FTSE 100 companies could choose to settle their pension deficits in full by withholding dividends, many are reluctant to do so against their relative enthusiasm for declaring dividends for their shareholders.

 According to JLT’s research, 44 FTSE 100 companies could settle their pension deficits in full with a payment of up to one year’s dividend, 9 companies would need a payment of up to two years’ dividends to settle their pension deficits in full and 7 companies would need a payment of more than two years’ dividends in order to settle their pension deficits in full.

 The total disclosed pension deficit of the FTSE 100 companies was £26 billion and the total dividends paid by companies with a defined benefit pension scheme in the FTSE 100 was £68.5 billion as at 31 September 2016 (latest data available).

 This compares to a deficit of £48 billion and dividends of £67 billion one year ago. In total, the amount contributed to FTSE 100 company pension schemes was £13.5 billion, up from £13.4 billion in the previous 12 months.

 Charles Cowling, Director, JLT Employee Benefits, comments: “Actuarial valuations carried out this year are likely to show not only much bigger deficits than three years ago but also a massive increase in contributions needed to fund ongoing DB benefits – for those few pension schemes that are still providing DB benefits to employees. This is going to lead to some very tough negotiations on pension scheme contributions. With seven FTSE100 companies already paying more in pension contributions than in dividends to shareholders, this has the potential to hit shareholder returns. Pension scheme members may also suffer as the last few open Private Sector DB pension schemes are closed in the face of impossibly high contribution costs.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

94 percent view State Pension as an entitlement not benefit
Majority of adults aged 66+ say that Triple Lock is affordable and fair to older generations. Around one in seven rely on the State Pension to provide
Fair play off the pitch
Male players in the English Premier League earn an average of more than £3 million per year, while their female counterparts average around £47,000. T
Why Bitcoin matters to Pension Schemes
Back in November 2024, Cartwright Pension Trusts announced its role in facilitating the first-ever UK DB pension trust investment in Bitcoin. With the

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.