Pensions - Articles - GMP Equalisation soars to top of Pension Schemes To Do List


New figures from Equiniti reveal that GMP Equalisation has rocketed in importance for pension schemes following the landmark Lloyd’s case earlier this year.

 The proportion of professionals – ranging from pension scheme trustees to administrators and pension managers – who said that GMP Equalisation would be a priority increased from 15% in 2018 to 58% this year, a rise of 43 percentage points. 

 The figures for most other projects remained constant, however the significance of GMP was re-enforced by 45% of respondents stating that GMP Rectification is a priority, the second most common response. Nearly a quarter (23%) also said that working towards either a buy-out a buy-in would be on their to-do list as that market continues to expand rapidly.

 Despite the increased focus on GMPs, a fifth (19%) of professionals confessed that they had low knowledge of the current GMP legislation. Also, despite the value of robust data and processes for GMP and buy-ins/outs, just 42% said that they did not intend to embark on a project to improve their scheme’s TPR score.

 Chris Connelly, Propositions & Solutions Director at Equiniti’s pension business, warned firms that the clock is ticking and that the time for decision-making was fast approaching a critical stage, commenting:

 “Pension schemes have had GMP Equalisation looming over them for years now. Wednesday’s news that a second hearing on past pension transfers in the Lloyds case will be scheduled in 2020 is likely to extend the saga. However, it is no excuse for firms to continue postponing the problem – they must start assessing their data and getting on with the corrections that they will inevitably have to carry out.

 “In its business plan, The Pensions Regulator stressed the importance of record keeping and how it intends to focus on those schemes who are not taking data quality seriously. We can infer that it will not be long before the Regulator includes schemes who are not making significant progress on their GMP equalisation.

 “The GMP Equalisation Working Group is doing a great job of providing guidance to schemes and more is expected this year. I understand that schemes need to take stock and see which equalisation method would best apply to their own circumstances, but action is needed before the regulator feels intervention is required.

 “Good data is absolutely critical, yet it remains an undervalued aspect of scheme management. Given the timescales involved, many schemes may have changed platforms or administrators, and may not have easy access to some of this data if they have not already gone through their rectification cases.

 “Some schemes may encounter huge problems causing major time delays and financial outlay if they don’t work on these fundamentals. It will also carry a significant impact on their ability to achieve a long-term goal of buyout which remains a major focus for trustees, as these figures reveal.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Just Group comment on the FCAs Sector Views report
Retirees are less likely to switch provider when taking out income drawdown or guaranteed income for life plans than they are for credit cards or cash
Speculation on Chancellor removing pension tax relief
Growing speculation that the chancellor may be planning to remove higher rate tax relief from pension contributions in his March budget. Aegon warns t
TPRs regulatory report on House of Fraser Pension Scheme
TPR regulatory intervention report issued in relation to the House of Fraser pension scheme. The high street retailer House of Fraser went into admini

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.