Pensions - Articles - Government under-estimating LISA take-up


In an update to projected costs in the March Budget, Government has today released its impact assessment of the cost of the Lifetime ISA, due to be introduced in April 2017.

 Compared to the ISA market and take up of other products, Fidelity International believes these cost estimates are low and urges the Government to not seek to recoup costs by going after incentives to save for retirement.
  
 Richard Parkin, Head of Pensions Policy at Fidelity International said: “The cost of the Lifetime ISA is estimated to be £170 million in the next tax year rising to £830 million in the tax-year 2020/21 with the cost coming from the government bonus of 25% which is paid as a top up to savings of up to £4,000 a year. In its impact assessment released today, HM Treasury estimates that over 200,000 people could take out a Lifetime ISA next year rising to 800,000 in 2020/21. These seem like big numbers but are actually relatively small when compared to the current ISA market.
  
 “In particular, looking at ISA statistics for the tax year 2013/14 issued in August 2016, there were approximately 3.2 million subscriptions to Cash ISAs by those under age 40 with a further 450,000 into other types of ISA. Assuming only 20% of these people are saving for a deposit on a house then this would suggest over 700,000 might be attracted to the Lifetime ISA even before we consider the additional take-up that will be driven by the attraction of the 25% bonus.
  
 “The opportunity to get a 25% bonus when saving for a house will no doubt appeal to many young people struggling to scrape together a deposit. It seems likely then that many of today’s existing savers will quickly switch to this new product.
  
 As these numbers show, just looking at what’s already in Cash ISAs would suggest that the government estimates of take up are on the low side, perhaps significantly so. This isn’t allowing for switches from other savings’ products or the incentive for the bank of mum and dad to stump up extra cash to take advantage of the top-up.
  
 “The government recognises that their estimates are highly uncertain but it’s clear that this could be a very costly policy.
  
 Given the chancellor’s original aim was to limit the cost of tax-relief on pensions it was somewhat surprising to see this new incentive being announced in the last budget. We have to make sure that any overrun of cost on the Lifetime ISA isn’t used as a reason to take aim at incentives to save for retirement.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

DC Pension Tracker Q3 2025
The Aon UK DC Pension Tracker fell over the quarter, with the younger savers seeing decreases in their expected outcomes, while the older members’ exp
Employers must take lead in retirement adequacy crisis
Employers will end up taking most of the responsibility for helping to solve the retirement adequacy problem if we are to see real and impactful chang
Two thirds of Administrators involved in pension strategy
With forthcoming legislation, from Inheritance Tax on unused pension pots to the 2025 Pension Schemes Bill set to have considerable implications for p

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.