Pensions - Articles - High Court PPF ruling a ‘timely warning’


 Commenting on the news that the The High Court has ruled that companies cannot challenge Pension Protection Fund (PPF) levies based on failure scores calculated using out-of-date information, Nick Griggs, Partner at Barnett Waddingham, says:

 “The High Court decision in the West of England Ship Owners Insurance Services case is a timely warning that data issues arising from the cross-over to Experian as the PPF’s insolvency provider should be identified and addressed promptly to mitigate the risk of overstated levy charges. The issues are not directly related, but there is a clear parallel.

 “Even before the switch to Experian comes the new D&B model for calculating insolvency probabilities, which may yet come into effect by 31 March this year and may focus on new areas where companies have not had the opportunity to review and optimise their information. I would not expect retrospective changes to the month-end D&B scores to be allowed so it will be vital that you review your new D&B score promptly.”  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

94 percent view State Pension as an entitlement not benefit
Majority of adults aged 66+ say that Triple Lock is affordable and fair to older generations. Around one in seven rely on the State Pension to provide
Fair play off the pitch
Male players in the English Premier League earn an average of more than £3 million per year, while their female counterparts average around £47,000. T
Why Bitcoin matters to Pension Schemes
Back in November 2024, Cartwright Pension Trusts announced its role in facilitating the first-ever UK DB pension trust investment in Bitcoin. With the

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.