Pensions - Articles - IAS19 update for year end 31 March 2019

Funding levels broadly unchanged but what does the final quarter have in store?Looking ahead to the 31 March 2019 year-end, most companies reporting at that date are currently looking at a broadly unchanged IAS19 funding position. The average funding level disclosed by FTSE100 companies in our most recent survey was 96%, and for a typical scheme this is likely to stay around the same level based on market movement to 31 December 2018.

 By Martin Hooper, FIA, Associate at Barnett Waddingham 


 The position was looking much more favourable at the end of November but a sharp fall equity markets and a reduction in corporate bond yields pushing up liabilities wiped out most of those gains during December.

 What will happen in the run up to “Brexit”?
 The UK is currently due to leave the EU on 29 March, which is the last working day before 31 March. Market conditions and asset valuations at this date will be used to determine assets and liability values for IAS19 valuations. It is possible that markets will be volatile in the run-up date, particularly if negotiations on agreeing a deal run right up to the deadline. It is also unclear whether such volatility will result in the position being better or worse at the year end. Much will depend on how much exposure schemes have to equity markets, overseas markets and how well hedged the funding position is against movements in expected future interest and inflation rates.

 It will be difficult for companies to take any definitive action to mitigate against the potential volatility at this stage but they should ensure they understand what impact significant market movements could have on their IAS19 position if the accounting position is a material concern.

 GMP equalisation – we now have some clarity
 The judgement in the Lloyds Bank case confirmed that UK schemes with GMP liabilities accrued between 17 May 1990 and 5 April 1997 will almost certainly need to recalculate and increase benefits for many scheme members. The emerging trend is for the expected cost of doing so to be recognised in profit and loss for the period covering the date of the judgement 26 October 2018. Our understanding is that most major audit firms are likely to insist on this treatment unless it can be clearly demonstrated that the IAS19 already included a realistic provision for the cost of GMP equalisation.

 Where companies have not already done so they should engage with their advisers to understand the expected impact and the extent to which there are any options available to mitigate the impact on the year-end figures. Our experience so far is that the cost will lie somewhere in the range of 0% to 3% of the overall scheme liabilities but it is highly dependent on the scheme demographics and benefits structure.

Back to Index

Similar News to this Story

Sackers launch guide for trustees on pension transcations
Sackers have published its latest guide for trustees on buy-ins, buy-outs and longevity transactions. This guide is focused on supporting pension sche
Pensions Minister echoes climate warnings in Westminster
MPs from across the House of Commons have debated climate change and pensions. Pensions Minister Guy Opperman responded. Earlier he spoke of ‘kickstar
New tools allow pension schemes to deliver greater value
New tools helping pension schemes deliver greater value for money for millions of savers have been launched today (21 May) by the Cost Transparency In

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS


Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.