Investment - Articles - Investors could be paying over-the-odds in adviser commision


 VouchedFor.co.uk, the new "Tripadvisor for financial advisers", built an algorithm to crawl the web for IFA pricing details.

 The results - fee-based IFAs can leave investors far better off, but are difficult to find, with only 3% advertising a fee-based service.

 The VouchedFor.co.uk "Fee-Based Advice: Beyond The Tipping Point?" report reveals investors could be £4200 better off with a financial adviser who is fee-based rather than commission-based.

 The report found 55 fee-based Independent Financial Advisers (IFA) now publish their fees online. On average, they charge £143 per hour, or 1.8% of assets upfront followed by 0.7% p.a. thereafter for as long as the client retains their services. They refund all commissions, typically 3% upfront and 0.5% p.a. thereafter. A client investing £100k over 6 years, who seeks only basic one-off advice, can receive £4200 commission back (net of fees) with a fee-based adviser, which would otherwise have been pocketed by a commission-based adviser.

 In reality, fee-based advisers are committed to delivering high quality ongoing advice, selecting the very best products, meaning this benefit will often be best captured through better advice and outcomes, rather than commission refunds. Around 25% fee-based IFAs charge an average £1338 for a financial plan, pointing to an even higher quality of advice.

 From 2013, the Retail Distribution Review will ban sales commission due to the bias it creates. Instead all financial advisers will agree fees directly with their clients. However, the FSA has warned advisers may mis-sell in order to maximise commission while they can. 18% of IFAs are expected to leave the industry in 2013, and a further 66% remain predominantly commission-based. Already, mis-selling costs investors £400-600m p.a.

 The report found it can be difficult for consumers to find a fee-based adviser. Today only 230 IFA firms (around 3% of the total) advertise a fee-based option on their website, and many online IFA directories are unable to verify an IFA's charging structure.

 Adam Price, Founder at VouchedFor.co.uk comments,

 "While some advisers have embraced RDR early on, making their charges more transparent and enhancing their proposition, many are either yet to make the transition, or are resigned to leaving the industry."

 "In this transitory environment, the arguments for selecting a fee-based adviser who has already embraced RDR are more compelling than ever."

 "By issuing this report we hope to re-energise the debate, and encourage the dissemination of practical and current advice to consumers seeking an adviser they can trust."

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

The Autumn Budget will inevitably bring higher taxes
Oliver Faizallah, Head of Fixed Income Research at Charles Stanley, part of Raymond James Wealth Management, comments: “Markets are concerned about th
US shutdown knocks equities off course
Asian stocks are down along with US and European futures as US fails to avoid shutdown. Gold hits another all-time high as investors seek out safe hav
Celebrity splits shows need for financial advice in divorce
The separation of an Oscar-winning actress and Grammy-winning musician sparks questions for divorce and finances. While high-profile splits often domi

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.