Pensions - Articles - Labour needs to do more to protect pensioners


James McLeod, head of pensions at AES International, suggests if an elected Labour government wants to continue to reform the pensions market, it may need to take on more responsibility for guiding and protecting consumers.

 McLeod said: “Labour’s sentiment on ensuring pension savers get good value is of course well placed. However, it is much easier said than done. There is unprecedented pressure on pension providers and the IFA community to support the latest pension changes and, while the industry is doing as much as it can to support those reaching retirement, perhaps the government needs to take on even more responsibility for ensuring people are not ripped off by pension scammers.

 “There is plenty of guidance available already to people – either paid for or free, yet it is often not taken, and the current government has already taken some action. But perhaps the next government may want to consider more direct ways it can educate those reaching retirement about their options or clamping down harder on those who abuse the system.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Auto enrolment nets 800K more savers but challenges remain
89% of eligible employees were participating in a workplace pension in 2024. 21.7 million are saving into a workplace pension - more than double the 1
2025 to 2026 PPF levy invoicing on hold
We’re informing our levy payers that we’re putting the 2025/26 PPF levy invoicing on hold and expect to provide a further update this Autumn. The emai
Rethinking pension adequacy through a global lens
Festina Finance is urging UK policymakers to rethink what ‘pension adequacy’ really means, and to look to other countries for tried and tested solutio

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.