Investment - Articles - Lack of knowledge stops trustees capitalising on investments


Professional trustees’ appetite for taking risk has increased since pre-pandemic, according to a new study of Professional DB Trustees, conducted by Charles Stanley Fiduciary Management. Almost half (47%) of professional DB trustees revealed that their appetite for investment risk overall has increased, with around one in five (18%) saying that it has increased significantly. Just 14% said it had reduced. But the research also found that they feel their investment decisions are hampered by onerous regulation and a lack of knowledge.

 Professional Trustees want to take more risk across the board – in equities, credit markets and alternatives - as well as relaxing liability hedging. But burdensome regulation coupled with a lack of confidence in their investment knowledge mean it is unclear whether trustees have the freedom to enact their views.
 
 Despite emerging from a period of unparalleled market volatility, the findings reveal that appetite for equity risk has risen among almost half (49%), with almost a quarter (22%) saying that their appetite has ‘increased significantly’. Appetite for interest rate risk has increased among 75%, inflation risk 73%, and credit risk 60%. The findings suggest that trustees’ strongest preference would be to increase through tactical under-hedging of their liabilities - implying that they believe long-term interest rates are more likely to rise than fall.
 
 However, this risk appetite is not mirrored in their investment decisions. For example, only around a third of professional DB trustees (36%) are more likely to increase equity exposure than they were pre-pandemic. More than three quarters (78%) of Professional DB Trustees think that regulation is stifling their investment approach.
 
 Bob Campion, Senior Portfolio Manager, Charles Stanley Fiduciary Management said: “These results reveal the trustees’ paradox. On the one hand trustees want to take more equity risk, but on the other hand they don’t plan to invest more in equities. Similarly, while they want to take interest rate risk, are they prepared to relax hedging constraints? What is clear is that trustees need expert help to assess risk, to understand what ‘risk budgeting’ means for a pension scheme and to decide from all the options available to them.
 
 “Professional trustees shouldn’t feel as if they have to be investment experts – but they do need to work with dedicated experts they can trust. Deploying risk in the right way is a vital decision for any pension scheme. And while the results will only be known in hindsight, the good news is that trustees of any scheme now have access to dedicated experts and analysis to help craft the right strategy for their pension scheme by working with fiduciary managers like Charles Stanley.
 
 “We believe in the merits of equity markets as a long-term driver of returns – and that under-hedging can add value where risk budgets allow, particularly for pension schemes with distant funding targets. By helping trustees to understand risk properly we routinely support our clients to set and achieve sensible long-term funding plans by balancing all the risks they run.”
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Legal and General agree buy in with Sanofi Pension Scheme
Legal & General Assurance Society Limited (“Legal & General”) today announces that it has agreed a £760 million buy-in with the Sanofi Pension Scheme
PIMFA welcomes guide on Discretionary Investment Managers
PIMFA is pleased to announce the publication of a new guide for advisers and Discretionary Investment Managers (DIMs) aimed at helping them understand
Savers and investors struggling with financial advice gap
EY Seren research commissioned by The Investing and Saving Alliance (TISA) found that millions of potential savers and individual investors are strugg

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.