General Insurance Article - Law Society given permission to intervene in Prudential case


  

  

             
    
     The Law Society has been granted permission to intervene in Prudential’s appeal to the Supreme Court over legal professional privilege (LPP).
    
      
    
     The Law Society had intervened in the Court of Appeal case of Prudential PLC and Prudential (Gibraltar) Limited v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and Philip Pandolfo (HM Inspector of Taxes).
    
      
    
     Prudential had sought to extend the existing rule of LPP - which gives certain communications between a lawyer and their client absolute confidentiality so that it cannot be disclosed to the court or third parties without the client’s consent - to advice on tax law given by accountants.
    
      
    
     The Court of Appeal unanimously confirmed that legal professional privilege (LPP) does not apply to any other professional except qualified lawyers -solicitors and barristers.
    
      
    
     The Law Society is intervening in this appeal because Prudential is againseeking to extend legal professional privilege beyond the legal profession.
    
      
    
     Welcoming the news that the Law Society had another opportunity to put forward arguments on behalf of the solicitors’ profession in the appeal, Linda Lee said: “LPP is closely tied to the administration of justice. The first duty of a solicitor, like other lawyers, is to the Court and the second is to the client. In this respect lawyers are unique among the professions.
    
      
    
     “If LPP is opened up to any professional person who asserts that they give advice on the law, such as tax advice, they can then seek to withhold vital information from bodies such as HMRC.  Extending LPP in such a way risks creating uncertainty over what can and cannot fall under LPP. The boundaries of LPP must remain clear.
    
      
    
     “We believe that if LPP is to be used on a wider basis it is up to Parliament to legislate to that effect. The Court of Appeal took our view that it is a matter of public policy what the bounds of LPP should be.
    
      
    
     "If LPP is to be extended beyond the advice of the legal professions it must be done via statute that clearly defines the limits and conditions of any extension both as to the areas of law or the professional adviser to ensure certainty as to the scope of its application."
   

  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Hurricanes and earthquakes could lead to USD300bn losses
Following the long-term annual growth trend of 5–7%, global insured natural catastrophe losses may reach USD 145 billion in 2025, mainly driven by sec
FCA set to launch live AI testing service
The FCA is seeking views from firms about how its live AI testing service can help them to deploy safe and responsible AI, which will benefit UK consu
Over one third of London market firms now actively using AI
The Lloyd’s Market Association (LMA) has hosted a seminar on the use of AI within the London specialty market. The seminar referenced results from a r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.