Pensions - Articles - LGPS Fit for the Future proposal presents major challenges


Quantum Advisory has emphasised that more work is needed before proposals on the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) framework can move forward.

 Last November, the UK Government put forward a package of ambitious proposals to reform the structure, investment and governance of the LGPS, followed by an industry-wide consultation, which closed last month.

 The review focused on three key areas:
 • Asset Pooling: Administering Authorities (AAs) will be required to fully delegate investment strategy to pools, which will develop internal investment management capabilities and become FCA-regulated. All AAs' assets must be transferred to pools.
 • Governance: AAs will need to prepare governance strategies, designate a senior LGPS officer, and participate in biennial independent governance reviews.
 • Local Investment: AAs will formalise objectives for local investments, with pools managing local investment opportunities.

 Paul Francis, Principal, said: “While the goal of centralising decision-making to improve efficiency is a good one, the potential impact on AAs and scheme members could be significant. There is a real risk that the proposals could weaken AAs’ control, create conflicts of interest with pools providing principal investment advice, and complicate the balancing of local investment goals with fiduciary duties.”

 The proposed shift towards centralised asset management and delegated investment strategy raises several important concerns:
 • Fiduciary Duties: AAs are worried that by setting broad goals and handing over the implementation to pools, they may not fully meet their responsibilities. More clarity is needed to ensure AAs remain accountable.
 • Conflict of Interest: With pools providing the main investment advice, the risk of conflicts of interest increases. AAs should have the ability to seek independent advice to make well-rounded decisions that are best for members.
 • Oversight and Accountability: independent oversight is crucial to ensure accountability at both AAs and pool levels. Without clear and ongoing monitoring, the effectiveness of the changes could be compromised.

 Stefano Carnevale, Senior Investment Consultant, continued: “In the coming months, pools will need significant transformation to meet the new requirements, such as gaining FCA authorisation and improving internal investment management and advisory capabilities. This process could involve substantial changes to personnel and investment processes. It is also crucial to understand how AAs will maintain accountability and ensure decisions align with members' best interests. Independent advice and oversight will be key to preventing conflicts of interest and ensuring transparency. While the UK Government’s proposals for LGPS overhaul present a forward-looking vision and could significantly reshape LGPS management, more work is needed before a final framework can be implemented. Ultimately, the framework must be manageable and serve the best interests of scheme members while promoting effective and sustainable governance.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

PPF marks 20 years of protection in its Annual Report
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has published its 2024/25 Annual Report and Accounts, marking its 20th anniversary with a year of strong financial p
DC pensions continue to back Net Zero despite ESG backlash
Barnett Waddingham’s latest DC Sustainability Report finds a 34% increase in allocations to funds with a climate target in the growth stage since orig
Chancellors focus on guided retirement for pensions savers
Ahead of the Mansion House speech to be delivered by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves on the evening of 15 July, Glyn Bradley, Chair of Pensions Board at t

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.