Pensions - Articles - LGPS funds need clear evidence for compliance to TPR Code


LGPS Funds must provide clear evidence and maintain robust internal controls to demonstrate compliance with TPR’s General Code of Practice (the Code), says Hymans Robertson. With each Fund having its own specific actions to show that robust governance processes are in place, ongoing monitoring will be vital, warns the leading pensions and financial services consultancy.

 Funds should not, however, start a compliance assessment straight away. Instead, they should implement a four-step action plan that starts with training to ensure officers, committees and boards understand the regulator’s expectations. They are:

 1. Training: Train Officers, Committees and Boards on the expectations specifically for LGPS Funds set out by TPR within the General Code.
 2. Assessment: Assess current levels of compliance with the Code, prioritising the elements relevant to LGPS Funds denoted as “must” by the Regulator, followed by those areas highlighted as ‘should’ and ‘best practice’.
 3. Identify: identify the steps required to achieve full compliance, for example what new policies or processes will be required, following the initial assessment
 4. Plan: set out specific actions and assign these to individuals, with a realistic timescale to complete each action. This plan should be monitored to ensure progress is made.
 
 To support LGPS Funds to self-assess, Hymans Robertson developed a TPR General Code of Practice compliance checker. The checker provides Funds with an approach to ascertain, track, and then implement any changes they need to make. It sets out the specific requirements for LGPS Funds, filtering out those issues which do not apply. The checker also provides easy progress reporting, including progress-tracking over time, and allows Funds to capture all General Code actions with owners assigned to each action.
 
 Commenting on the need for Funds to be strategic in their approach to the General Code, Andrew McKerns, Senior Governance and Administration consultant, says: “The General Code covers such a vast area that Funds will need to be very organised in how they achieve compliance. Full or nearly full compliance will give them strong evidence that they operate with effective decision making, oversight, processes, and internal controls.
 
 "However, even if there are actions which seem obvious to increase compliance, Funds should be careful not to make knee-jerk changes. Officers need to establish appropriate processes for their compliance requirements. That way, Officers can demonstrate a clear “before and after picture” to their Committee and Board, and the methodology they used for any changes made.
 
 "Focusing on preparation and planning will put Funds in a better position to mitigate any issues, such as reputational damage, penalties or further scrutiny from TPR if non-compliant.
 
 "To be successful in the long-run, Funds will need to carry out a fair bit of work. Being thorough and methodical is how they will see the benefits.”
 
  

 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Pension and savings review needed from incoming government
A recent survey by PensionBee, highlights a strong desire (87%) among consumers for the incoming government to conduct a comprehensive review of the p
Common vision between DB Sponsors and Trustees is vital
DB Trustees and sponsors must share a common vision when considering run-on says Hymans Robertson, as its latest update to the Excellence in Endgame i
DC schemes urged to review compliance
Errors in DC scheme contributions, such as incorrect contribution percentages and the incorrect application of tax relief, are becoming increasingly c

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.