Pensions - Articles - Mis-buying of LISAs a real issue


Commenting ahead of the publication of guidelines from the FCA on the regulation of sales of Lifetime ISAs, Steve Webb, Director of Policy at Royal London, said:

 “There is a real risk of a ‘mis-buying’ scandal as the wrong people take out Lifetime ISAs. For example:
 • “There should be a presumption against taking out a LISA for those who are not taking full advantage of the matching workplace pension contributions on offer from their employer; for example, a worker who puts £1 into a LISA would get 25p in top-up from the Government compared with a £1 contribution from an employer who was prepared to ‘match’ employee pension contributions.
 • “Young people who invest in a pension can take a long-term perspective and benefit from investing in higher risk assets; there is a real danger that those who take out a LISA will invest in cash, perhaps for a decade or more; a combination of low interest rates and rising inflation could make this a very poor savings strategy;
 • “The government has suggested that LISAs would be suitable for the self-employed because of the ability to withdraw cash, but the hefty exit penalty means self-employed people should not take out a LISA with a view to treating it like an easy-access savings account.
 • “People who have already bought a house should think very carefully before opening a LISA as a ‘retirement only’ product; with no contributions allowed after age fifty and a lock-in of cash until age sixty, there are serious questions about the suitability of the LISA for this group;

 “The LISA complicates the savings market and means that younger people who may not have access to financial advice will face difficult choices between staying in a workplace pension or opting for a Lifetime ISA. It is vital that Government and regulators put in place a strong regulatory regime to prevent people from taking out an unsuitable product.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.