Pensions - Articles - Need to avoid knee jerk pension reforms in Budget


The March Budget is widely expected to focus on measures designed to drive up economic activity rates, especially among older workers.

 A range of measures has been floated in the media and in speeches, including potential reforms to potential tax relief to encourage work and saving, a wider rollout of ‘mid-life’ MOTs to discourage people from retiring onto inadequate DC pension pots, and even a tax break for older workers returning to work.

 Today (21st Feb) comes more calls for change, with the Resolution Foundation arguing that the normal minimum pension age should be raised beyond the planned increase from 55 to 57 due to take place by 2028. The Resolution Foundation argues that this would encourage more people to stay in work for longer and tackle an increase in early retirement. They also call for a cap on tax-free lump sums.

 However, former Pensions Minister and LCP partner Steve Webb has warned against tweaking the pension system as a ‘knee-jerk’ reaction to a reduction in economic activity amongst older workers.

 Steve Webb said: “Whilst the desire to make later life work more rewarding is laudable, this should not be at the expense of yet more incremental tinkering with the pension system. In particular, the idea of hiking the minimum age at which people can access their pensions would be a backward step. The existing plan to raise the age to 57 is already adding to the complexity of the system and further increases would add more complexity with no obvious benefit. There are some people who have retired early during the pandemic but this will often be combined with a secure final salary pension and changing pension rules for DC schemes will not affect this group. Any changes to pension rules need to be justifiable for their own sake and not a knee-jerk reaction to the rise in economic inactivity”.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.