Investment - Articles - Neil Woodford and illiquid assets


Celene Lee, Principal and Senior Investment Consultant at pensions and employee benefits consulting firm, Buck, comments:

 “The decision by Kent County Council pension fund to withdraw its £236m investment mandate from the Woodford Equity Income Fund has had damaging consequences, not just for Neil Woodford, but for the fund management industry as a whole. This week’s developments highlight the importance of having a regulatory portfolio cap on investing in illiquid assets. However, it’s important to realise that investing in these assets is not, and should not, be considered as unnecessarily risky.

 Illiquid assets can help investors meet their long-term investment strategy, and also provide potentially higher returns and diversification of their investment portfolio. Clearly, getting the balance right between illiquid and easy-to-sell assets is vital, but for investors who fully understand their investment objectives and appreciate the market and the risks involved, illiquidity should not be a dirty word.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Top annuity misconceptions dispelled
49% of over 50s recognise that annuities provide income certainty – up from 39% a year ago. Income certainty in retirement remains a key consideration
Savings rates set to fall with quarter of savers in the dark
The Bank of England is expected to cut rates next week, and the market is pricing in around three more cuts in 2025. In the past 18 months, savings ra
Royal London complete buyin with The College of Law Pension
The latest transaction is between Royal London and The College of Law Pension and Assurance Scheme. Hymans Robertson and Linklaters advised the Truste

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.