Life - Articles - Office lifestyle can adversely affect illness and stress

 Despite being the most common working environment, open plan offices may actually be detrimental to employee health, wellbeing and productivity, according to recent Canada Life Group Insurance research.

 When asked to rank how easy it is to be healthy and productive in their working environment, employees in open plan offices gave an average score of 6.1 and 6.5 out of ten respectively. In comparison, employees who work mostly from home gave scores of 8.1 for health and 7.7 for productivity.

 While employees who work from home only took an average of 1.8 sick days last year, workers in open plan offices took over 70% more (3.1 days). Those working in an open plan office are also almost six times more likely than home workers to believe their working environment promotes stress (28% vs 5%), with previous research demonstrating workplace stress can significantly increase absence levels2.

 Health and wellbeing hampered by office environment
 Perhaps unsurprisingly given the proximity of other colleagues, staff who work in open plan offices are some of the most likely to say that illness spreads quickly in their organisation (34%), second only to teachers in classroom environments (47%). Employees who work from home are virtually unaffected by this problem: only 1% agreed illness spreads quickly where they work.

 Home workers are most likely to agree that their working environment promotes stress-free and calm conditions (52%), with those in a private office (19%) coming a distant second. In contrast, only 12% of those in open plan offices agree with this, with over a quarter (28%) saying that it actively creates a stressful working environment versus 5% of home workers.

 Better benefits or better communication?
 Despite the challenges office lifestyles present, the benefits in terms of easy communication and social integration are strong enough for employers to continue to develop the model. For example, 29% of employees in open plan offices agreed their working environment allowed for easy communication between colleagues, followed by 24% in private offices and 20% in cubicle style offices. In contrast, only 5% who work from home agree.

 However, there is a marked disparity in the benefits offered to home workers and those in office locations. For example, 41% of office workers believed their employer provided access to an Employee Assistance Programme, while only 11% of home workers thought they could utilise such a service. There is a similar discrepancy in the provision of local rehabilitation support (39% v 8%) and second medical opinion services (24% v 9%), which were rated as the most important services available alongside Group Income Protection products.3

 Another possibility is that these benefits are offered to home workers exactly as they are to their office-based colleagues, but their employers are not effectively communicating what is available to them. This is a risk with working away from a central workforce, but employers should have measures in place to ensure these staff do not feel isolated, and that their wellbeing is being taken care of just as much as any other employee.

 Paul Avis, Marketing Director of Canada Life Group, comments:
 “I have always worked for employers who appreciate that an increased level of productivity can be gained through a flexible approach to home working. While often missing out on the social aspects and colleague engagement, having clear, focused and uninterrupted time is priceless. I have found that a combination of home and office working is the best outcome for me, but note that employers should always be mindful of remote workers. At Canada Life we have field-based Sales Teams and home-based Claims Management Consultants and Rehabilitation Consultants; we certainly don’t want them to feel isolated or under-valued purely because they do not come in to the office every day.

 “Despite the advent of technological advances such as faster broadband, employers have not proactively embraced the opportunity to change working patterns. With increasing commute times for many, trusting employees to work from home can increase morale and reduce stress levels whilst giving employees more time in their day. For those of us who are truly engaged with the workplace, the recycling of commuting time into work time provides an immediate gain in productivity, as well as improved health and wellbeing."

Back to Index

Similar News to this Story

ECPA publishes covenant longevity paper
The Employer Covenant Practitioners Association (“ECPA”) has today published a paper entitled “Time horizons and the employer covenant: the importance
Improved results from predictive analytics for Life Insurers
Demand for predictive analytics continues to rise, as life insurers seek new solutions to sharpen business performance and boost customer relations in
Over 3bn pounds annual maternity leave earnings gap
Women taking maternity leave collectively lose out on £3.2bn worth on earnings, a fall of nearly half their average annual salary, reveals new researc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS


Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.