Pensions - Articles - Only 12 percent of Corporates have endgame strategy in place


Hymans Robertson is warning that schemes are sleep walking into a de facto buy-out because of a lack of endgame strategy. The results of polling at a recent firm webinar on how to avoid this risk, found that the majority of those surveyed (87.8%) do not have a fully planned end game strategy with clear structured timeframes in place, leading to decisions being made almost by default.

 Further indication for the need for better endgame understanding was highlighted by a second poll which found that only half of those surveyed (56.7%) would buy-out now if they could.

 To help Corporates avoid de facto buy-outs taking place, the leading pension and financial services consultancy has launched a new free interactive guide to help increase understanding of the endgame landscape and various options.

 Commenting on the tough decisions facing Corporates, Leonard Bowman, Head of Corporate DB Endgame Strategy, Hymans Robertson, says:“As funding improves for many schemes there is increased urgency on companies to work out their preferred endgame strategy and to engage with their trustees . Many have avoided addressing this issue, due to the perception that any change in decisions would lead to an investment and funding strategy involving higher company contributions. They are also likely to be wary of taking the risk of becoming “locked in” to a strategy that might not make sense in the future if circumstances change. Whether or not a whole scheme buy-in or buy-out is the way to go, should always be a conscious decision, given the scale of the financial implications.

 “The many different options could be causing confusion for corporate sponsors and, as a result, they might be unintentionally ‘sleep walking’ down an endgame path. Many companies do not seem to realise they are heading towards a relatively short-term ‘de facto’ buy-out through a single, or series of smaller, buy-ins.

 “Our webinar findings highlight the confusion in this space and our recently released guide aims to give companies a better understanding of the issues, to help with decision making, and in particular to establish whether a buy-out should take place as soon as it can or instead schemes should look towards a longer-term run-off strategy.”

 Copies of the guide can be found here.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

PPF marks 20 years of protection in its Annual Report
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has published its 2024/25 Annual Report and Accounts, marking its 20th anniversary with a year of strong financial p
DC pensions continue to back Net Zero despite ESG backlash
Barnett Waddingham’s latest DC Sustainability Report finds a 34% increase in allocations to funds with a climate target in the growth stage since orig
Chancellors focus on guided retirement for pensions savers
Ahead of the Mansion House speech to be delivered by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves on the evening of 15 July, Glyn Bradley, Chair of Pensions Board at t

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.