Pensions - Articles - Pension endgame strategies

The Pensions Management Institute (PMI) announces Insight Investment as its ‘Insight Partner’ for de-risking investment strategies. The partnership will focus on the key considerations facing schemes around whether to buy-in or not to buy-in, which PMI and Insight believe will be a crucial decision for many in 2019.

 As part of the PMI’s role in supporting innovation on topical issues and delivering expert viewpoints to members, the PMI develops Insight Partnerships with organisations considered thought leaders and industry experts. In this capacity, Insight Investment will take a lead in communications activity around Pension endgame strategies, including a session at the PMI’s Trustee Workbench conference on 6 June in London, which will explore some of the key considerations for endgame de-risking planning. 

 Gareth Tancred, Chief Executive of the Pensions Management Institute, commented: “Last year was a record for bulk-annuity deals and this trend is set to continue, while the emergence of commercial consolidators and other buy-out alternatives means schemes need to think carefully when considering their de-risking options.

 “Against this backdrop, we are delighted to be working with Insight Investment to help our members keep abreast of the latest thinking around whether to buy-in or not to buy-in all or part of their scheme assets.”

 Serkan Bektas, Head of Client Solutions Group at Insight Investment, explained: “Given the significance of the decisions facing pension schemes today, we are delighted to partner with the PMI to share our analysis and discuss the pertinent issues involved so trustees are informed and equipped to navigate their endgame options.

 “De-risking decisions can be as complex as they are critical. For example, at first glance, a pensioner buy-in may appear to be a step towards a full buy-out by securing payments for some scheme members. However, in the context of the whole scheme, a buy-in may result in a riskier asset strategy and lower hedge ratio for the residual liabilities, extending the time it takes to achieve a full buy-out. It is therefore critical that schemes fully consider overall value for money, the impact on their total portfolio and whether sufficient flexibility has been retained to deal with risks that are not easily hedged.”

Back to Index

Similar News to this Story

HMRC admits it has not got a clue how many are facing fines
A new FOI response obtained by Royal London has revealed that HMRC simply do not know how many people they are fining each year over breaching rules r
75 percent of pension schemes want more investment in data
XPS Pensions Group (“XPS”) reveal 75% of those responsible for pension schemes believe more investment is needed to improve member data, according to
Hymans Robertson comment on GMP Equalisation call to action
Commenting on the GMP Equalisation Working Group’s initial guidance for good practice in GMP equalisation, Matt Davis, Head of GMP Equalisation at Hym

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS


Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.