Pensions - Articles - Pension schemes should not rest easy after Scot vote


 The Scottish people yesterday voted to remain part of the UK. A vote for independence would have been expected to lead to greater costs and complexity for pension schemes in Scotland and the rest of the UK.
 
 Commenting on the outcome of the referendum, Mike Kennedy, Partner at Barnett Waddingham said:

 
 “The prospect of schemes operating across the Scottish border being forced to meet stricter funding requirements has now fallen away. However, pension schemes and their sponsoring employers should not rest easy. The Scottish Parliament was promised additional powers from Westminster in the run-up to the vote and it is likely that they will seek to use them. If differences arise in legislation and taxation between Scotland and the rest of the UK, this will lead to complications for administering schemes with members in both regions, and therefore increased costs.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.