Pensions - Articles - Plans for social care could be good for pensions


PTL said that the recently announced plans for funding social care could be good for pension adequacy.

 Richard Butcher, MD of PTL, commented: “Until now, successive governments have failed to come up with a plan for dealing with the costs of long-term healthcare despite several commissions and working groups being set up to produce policy recommendations. As a consequence, it looked likely that pensions would become the ‘de facto’ solution because the cost would have to be paid from what income there was.

 “The recent announcements potentially change that narrative. Provided the proposed increase in national insurance is genuinely redirected to fund long term healthcare in due course, then pensioners won’t have to pay for social care out of their income. While accepting some pensioners are well off, the average pensioner isn’t. Reducing the demands on their income means the average pensioner will be better able to afford other things i.e. a net increase in adequacy. This can only be a good thing.”
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

FCA propose new interactive digital pension planning tools
Alongside targeted support proposals, the FCA also launched a Consultation Paper containing a package of proposals to help consumers navigate their fi
Building resilience in derisking strategies for DC members
The traditional model of derisking defined contribution (DC) pension schemes into default investment strategies is increasingly out of step with how t
7% of employers see salary sacrifice change making an impact
30% of schemes currently pass some or all of NIC savings to members. 13% of schemes believe it’s highly likely they will need to review current pensio

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.