Pensions - Articles - Practical solutions needed for Transfer Regulation issues


The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has submitted a short response to the FCA discussion paper, “Pensions: Adapting our requirements for a changing market”

 The SPP focused its feedback on the single issue of Transfer Regulations, highlighting “numerous problems with the Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Conditions for Transfers) Regulations 2021 that are neither efficient nor in the consumers best interests and therefore require action.”

 
 The SPP states that there has been strong pensions industry feedback, not least from members of both SPP’s Legislation and Administration Committees, that the practical application of these regulations is causing problems before going on to list a number of examples;
 
 “…problems with the provisions relating to overseas investments, red flags, amber flags, ‘incentives’ and ‘safe lists’. The flags are not clearly defined, members face unnecessary obstacles and pension trustees face the dilemma of whether to take a literal or pragmatic approach to the application of these regulations”
 
 In practice, this means that, “the current regulations deem too many incentives to be automatic red flags with Trustees having to assess any incentives not falling within the examples provided – it is likely Trustees and their legal advisers will err on the side of caution to avoid falling foul of the regulations.”
 
 One potential solution put forward by the SPP is for government to, “…consider amending the legislation to define certain incentives as automatic red flags whilst others should only be considered red flags where there is at least one other trigger event.”
 
 Amanda Cooke, Chair of the SPP’s Financial Services Regulation Committee, said: “The regulations continue to result in delays in transfer processing; don’t align with the original policy intent and are causing schemes and members considerable problems. As a result, we felt it was right to concentrate on this issue to again highlight industry concerns with a view to securing a practical solution.”
 
  SPP Response to FCA discussion paper

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.