Pensions - Articles - Profit warning from firms with DB pension schemes increase


The number of profit warnings from UK listed companies with a Defined Benefit (DB) pension scheme increased 46% year-on-year (y/y), from 13 in Q1 2021 to 19 in Q1 2022.

 The latest profit warning analysis from EY-Parthenon reveals that 26% of all UK listed warnings issued in Q1 2022 came from firms sponsoring a DB pension scheme. Across all listed companies, 72 profit warnings were issued in Q1 2022, 19 of them from firms with a DB pension scheme. Despite the y/y increase, the number of warnings in Q1 2022 dipped slightly from Q4 2021, when 22 warnings from listed companies with a DB scheme were issued, although the stressed firms remain in the same sectors.

 The majority (14) of companies with a DB pension scheme that issued a profit warning in Q1 2022 were from industrial or consumer-facing sectors, including FTSE Retailers, Industrial Support Services and Personal Care, Drug and Grocery Stores. These are some of the sectors that have been most affected by cost and supply chain pressures and have been particularly sensitive to the subsequent changes in business and consumer confidence. Rising overheads, including increased energy, fuel, wages, and material costs, were cited as the main reason for issuing a profit warning, with 53% of firms claiming this in Q1 2022, followed by supply chain disruption, which accounted for 26% of warnings.

 In Q1 2022, the overall number of profit warnings issued by UK listed companies increased 44% y/y, from 50 warnings in Q1 2021 to 72 warnings in the same period this year. Within this rise, a record 43% of warnings cited rising costs, followed by supply chain disruption (22%). Eleven per-cent (11%) cited the war in Ukraine.

 EY-Parthenon’s analysis also shows that 18 UK companies with a DB scheme have been acquired since the start of Q1 2021. Of the total 1,232 UK-registered listed companies, 262 still have a DB scheme attached.

 Karina Brookes, UK Pensions Covenant Advisory Leader and EY-Parthenon Partner, comments: “Listed companies with DB pensions schemes tend to be clustered in consumer and industrial sectors – sectors which are being most adversely impacted by rising costs and supply chain disruption. These companies are now also having to navigate growing inflationary pressures and a squeeze on consumer incomes, which is likely to continue over the course of this year at least.

 “As companies with DB schemes navigate an increasingly uncertain 2022, it’s imperative that trustees continue to monitor the covenant and identify early warning signs of disruption or distress. Scenario planning for unknowns such as rising inflation, interest rate hikes and increasing costs may prove useful in assessing the sponsor’s exposure to uncertainties and how they may impact performance in the near term. Using this analysis to set trigger events with sponsors could provide additional protection. As schemes mature, consideration of longer-term risks such as ESG in the context of the scheme’s longer term funding journey will be crucial to ensure time horizons are aligned.

 “Sponsors, on the other hand, will be focused on their cost base and navigating another set of uncertain economic pressures. At the same time the latest pensions legislation and the delayed notifiable events regime create additional pressure on resources. Sponsors should ensure they have a good team supporting them on pension matters, a strong relationship with pension scheme trustees and a clear view on how corporate strategies may impact the scheme.”

 Leah Evans, EY-Parthenon Head of Pension Risk Transfer, adds: “The recently published Annual Funding Statement from The Pension Regulator provided trustees and sponsors with a helpful steer of how to reflect current market volatility in their scheme management. Whilst market volatility is creating uncertainty for UK companies and their pension schemes, funding levels for many schemes have improved over the last 12 months, which should offer some comfort to trustees and allow sponsors a level of flexibility as they adapt their business to reflect changing market conditions. In particular, where schemes can afford a buy-out with an insurance company or, for schemes with weaker sponsors, a transfer to a consolidator, this could be beneficial for both trustees / members who achieve an increase in security for members as well as sponsors, who can focus on their corporate strategy.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Half of pensioner homeowners do not check State Benefits
Pensioner homeowners struggling with rising living costs urged to review State Benefit eligibility after new research shows nearly half have never che
Pensions are a long term investment and have time to recover
Experts from pension and investment specialists Quantum Advisory addressed members of the Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) on the tu
State auto enrolment credits could reduce Gender Pension Gap
The Government should introduce State auto-enrolment credits for career breaks and radically change the framework of occupational pensions to reduce t

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.